BUG: Fix bug in pd.eval when UnaryOp in function #48511
Merged
+17
−2
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
mroeschke
reviewed
Sep 12, 2022
mroeschke
reviewed
Sep 12, 2022
Added. |
mroeschke
approved these changes
Sep 14, 2022
|
Thanks @yuanx749 |
noatamir
pushed a commit
to noatamir/pandas
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 9, 2022
* Fix bug in pd.eval when negative value in function * Fix test * Add whatsnew * Change name check
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
.fillna(-1)does not work inpd.eval#46471doc/source/whatsnew/vX.X.X.rstfile if fixing a bug or adding a new feature.I ran into a similar issue, and added it in test. They both produce
AttributeError: 'UnaryOp' object has no attribute 'value'.