Skip to content

Issues: pandas-dev/pandas

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Author
Filter by author
Loading
Label
Filter by label
Loading
Use alt + click/return to exclude labels
or + click/return for logical OR
Projects
Filter by project
Loading
Milestones
Filter by milestone
Loading
Assignee
Filter by who’s assigned
Sort

Issues list

ENH: support for non-nanosecond precision in pd.Timedelta Closing Candidate May be closeable, needs more eyeballs Enhancement Non-Nano datetime64/timedelta64 with non-nanosecond resolution
#59389 opened Aug 2, 2024 by veenstrajelmer
1 of 3 tasks
ENH/BUG: pd.date_range() still defaults to nanosecond resolution Non-Nano datetime64/timedelta64 with non-nanosecond resolution
#59031 opened Jun 17, 2024 by jorisvandenbossche 3.0
API: timestamp resolution inference - default to one unit (if possible) instead of being data-dependent? Datetime Datetime data dtype Non-Nano datetime64/timedelta64 with non-nanosecond resolution Timestamp pd.Timestamp and associated methods
#58989 opened Jun 12, 2024 by jorisvandenbossche 3.0
BUG: Timestamp.unit should reflect changes in components after Timestamp.replace Bug Non-Nano datetime64/timedelta64 with non-nanosecond resolution
#57749 opened Mar 6, 2024 by wjsi
2 of 3 tasks
BUG: Convertion fails for columns with datetime64[ms] Bug IO JSON read_json, to_json, json_normalize Non-Nano datetime64/timedelta64 with non-nanosecond resolution
#57738 opened Mar 5, 2024 by alvarofagner
3 tasks done
BUG(?): Non nano + DatetOffset(component=0) re-infers resolution Frequency DateOffsets Non-Nano datetime64/timedelta64 with non-nanosecond resolution Numeric Operations Arithmetic, Comparison, and Logical operations
#57448 opened Feb 16, 2024 by mroeschke
BUG: Resampling with non nano returns an error Bug Non-Nano datetime64/timedelta64 with non-nanosecond resolution Regression Functionality that used to work in a prior pandas version Resample resample method
#57427 opened Feb 14, 2024 by khider
3 tasks done
2.3
Potential regression induced by PR #56037 Non-Nano datetime64/timedelta64 with non-nanosecond resolution Performance Memory or execution speed performance Regression Functionality that used to work in a prior pandas version
#57366 opened Feb 11, 2024 by rhshadrach 2.3
BUG: dt64[non_nano] + some_offsets incorrectly rounding Bug Frequency DateOffsets Non-Nano datetime64/timedelta64 with non-nanosecond resolution Numeric Operations Arithmetic, Comparison, and Logical operations
#56586 opened Dec 21, 2023 by jbrockmendel
BUG/API: round-tripping non-nano datetime64s with to_json/read_json Bug IO JSON read_json, to_json, json_normalize Non-Nano datetime64/timedelta64 with non-nanosecond resolution
#55827 opened Nov 4, 2023 by jbrockmendel
BUG: Pandas 2.0 loses type information from datetime64[M/D] when creating dataframes Bug Dtype Conversions Unexpected or buggy dtype conversions Error Reporting Incorrect or improved errors from pandas Non-Nano datetime64/timedelta64 with non-nanosecond resolution
#55301 opened Sep 26, 2023 by KianShepherd
3 tasks done
BUG: df1.merge(df2, on='ds', how='outer') not convert column ds to the highest resolution datetime type of the two dfs Bug Non-Nano datetime64/timedelta64 with non-nanosecond resolution Reshaping Concat, Merge/Join, Stack/Unstack, Explode
#55212 opened Sep 20, 2023 by seanslma
2 of 3 tasks
2.2.3
BUG: support non-nanos Timedelta objects in Python C API Bug Closing Candidate May be closeable, needs more eyeballs Non-Nano datetime64/timedelta64 with non-nanosecond resolution Timedelta Timedelta data type
#54682 opened Aug 22, 2023 by jorisvandenbossche
BUG: Timedelta created by to_timedelta does not add correctly to datetime in Pandas 2 Bug Non-Nano datetime64/timedelta64 with non-nanosecond resolution Numeric Operations Arithmetic, Comparison, and Logical operations Timedelta Timedelta data type
#53643 opened Jun 13, 2023 by Flix6x
3 tasks done
BUG: Timestamp constructor ignores unit parameter value Bug Non-Nano datetime64/timedelta64 with non-nanosecond resolution
#53198 opened May 12, 2023 by georgipeev
2 of 3 tasks
BUG: pd.Timestamp() defaults to [s] resolution instead of [ns] Docs Non-Nano datetime64/timedelta64 with non-nanosecond resolution
#52653 opened Apr 13, 2023 by Rob-DL
2 of 3 tasks
3.0
BUG: Series([int], dtype="timedelta64[non-nano]") returns 0 result Bug Non-Nano datetime64/timedelta64 with non-nanosecond resolution Timedelta Timedelta data type
#52457 opened Apr 5, 2023 by mroeschke
3 tasks done
BUG: UDFs with apply returning nanoseconds when compared to native binops that return seconds Apply Apply, Aggregate, Transform, Map Bug Non-Nano datetime64/timedelta64 with non-nanosecond resolution
#52411 opened Apr 4, 2023 by galipremsagar
2 of 3 tasks
BUG or as expected/designed?: Generating and calculation with timestamps out of bound? Bug Non-Nano datetime64/timedelta64 with non-nanosecond resolution
#52091 opened Mar 20, 2023 by kaibir
2 of 3 tasks
BUG: can't round-trip non-nano Timestamp Bug Non-Nano datetime64/timedelta64 with non-nanosecond resolution
#51060 opened Jan 30, 2023 by MarcoGorelli
3 tasks done
BUG: Index.get_indexer with mixed-reso datetime64s Bug Indexing Related to indexing on series/frames, not to indexes themselves Non-Nano datetime64/timedelta64 with non-nanosecond resolution Upstream issue Issue related to pandas dependency
#50690 opened Jan 12, 2023 by jbrockmendel
API: resolution for date_range, to_datetime, timedelta_range, to_timedelta API Design Non-Nano datetime64/timedelta64 with non-nanosecond resolution
#49060 opened Oct 12, 2022 by jbrockmendel
API: Timestamp/Timedelta resolution in __repr__ API Design Non-Nano datetime64/timedelta64 with non-nanosecond resolution Timedelta Timedelta data type Timestamp pd.Timestamp and associated methods
#49059 opened Oct 12, 2022 by jbrockmendel
BUG: In 1.5rc0 casting Series to datetime64 with specific but non-nanosecond units has no effect Astype Bug Non-Nano datetime64/timedelta64 with non-nanosecond resolution Regression Functionality that used to work in a prior pandas version
#48574 opened Sep 15, 2022 by zaneselvans
3 tasks done
BUG: lossed millisecond precision of data by "pandas.io.sql.to_sql" Bug IO SQL to_sql, read_sql, read_sql_query Non-Nano datetime64/timedelta64 with non-nanosecond resolution
#48435 opened Sep 7, 2022 by abcdehc
3 tasks done
ProTip! Mix and match filters to narrow down what you’re looking for.