You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This issue appears to be similar to #24786 except that here a lambda is used to create the tuples. The User Guide for Pandas states that
The result of the aggregation will have the group names as the new index. In the case of multiple keys, the result is a MultiIndex by default.
Thus I was expecting the tuples to be automatically combined to form a MultiIndex as opposed to an Index with tuples as indices. Internally, the Index.map()call converts the produced list of tuples to a MultiIndex, but when it produces the aggregation index, it appears to produce a single ``Index``` instead.
I wasn't sure if this was intended behaviour, or a bug; I apologize if it is the former!
Pandas version checks
I have checked that this issue has not already been reported.
I have confirmed this bug exists on the latest version of pandas.
I have confirmed this bug exists on the main branch of pandas.
Reproducible Example
Issue Description
This issue appears to be similar to #24786 except that here a lambda is used to create the tuples. The User Guide for Pandas states that
Thus I was expecting the tuples to be automatically combined to form a
MultiIndex
as opposed to anIndex
with tuples as indices. Internally, theIndex.map()
call converts the produced list of tuples to aMultiIndex
, but when it produces the aggregation index, it appears to produce a single ``Index``` instead.I wasn't sure if this was intended behaviour, or a bug; I apologize if it is the former!
Expected Behavior
Installed Versions
INSTALLED VERSIONS
commit : 0691c5c
python : 3.13.1
python-bits : 64
OS : Windows
OS-release : 10
Version : 10.0.18363
machine : AMD64
processor : AMD64 Family 21 Model 96 Stepping 1, AuthenticAMD
byteorder : little
LC_ALL : None
LANG : None
LOCALE : English_Canada.1252
pandas : 2.2.3
numpy : 2.2.1
pytz : 2024.2
dateutil : 2.9.0.post0
pip : 24.3.1
Cython : None
sphinx : None
IPython : None
adbc-driver-postgresql: None
adbc-driver-sqlite : None
bs4 : None
blosc : None
bottleneck : None
dataframe-api-compat : None
fastparquet : None
fsspec : None
html5lib : None
hypothesis : None
gcsfs : None
jinja2 : None
lxml.etree : None
matplotlib : None
numba : None
numexpr : None
odfpy : None
openpyxl : None
pandas_gbq : None
psycopg2 : None
pymysql : None
pyarrow : None
pyreadstat : None
pytest : None
python-calamine : None
pyxlsb : None
s3fs : None
scipy : None
sqlalchemy : None
tables : None
tabulate : None
xarray : None
xlrd : None
xlsxwriter : None
zstandard : None
tzdata : 2024.2
qtpy : None
pyqt5 : None
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: