-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
BUG: Can't change datetime precision in columns/rows #57838
Comments
cc @MarcoGorelli is this pdep6 related? It looks like this is a case of upcasting @erezinman all cases that don't work set inplace instead of swapping out the underlying data, so different semantics can happen. |
thanks for the ping looks like it's been like this since at least 2.0.2, so I don't think it's related to any pdep-6 work (which only started in 2.1): In [2]: import pandas as pd
In [3]:
...: df = pd.DataFrame({'time': pd.to_datetime(['2021-01-01 12:00:00', '2021-01-01 12:00:01', '2021-01-01 12:00:02'])
...: ,
...: 'value': [1, 2, 3]})
In [4]: df.iloc[:, 0] = df.iloc[:, 0].astype('M8[us]')
In [5]: df.dtypes
Out[5]:
time datetime64[ns]
value int64
dtype: object
In [6]: pd.__version__
Out[6]: '2.0.2' |
take |
Hello @MarcoGorelli and @phofl I believe I have corrected this bug, however one of the tests (pandas/tests/copy_view/test_indexing.py::test_subset_set_column_with_loc) seems to be failing with my solution. The output is as follows: @pytest.mark.parametrize(
"dtype", ["int64", "float64"], ids=["single-block", "mixed-block"]
)
def test_subset_set_column_with_loc(backend, dtype):
# Case: setting a single column with loc on a viewing subset
# -> subset.loc[:, col] = value
_, DataFrame, _ = backend
df = DataFrame(
{"a": [1, 2, 3], "b": [4, 5, 6], "c": np.array([7, 8, 9], dtype=dtype)}
)
df_orig = df.copy()
subset = df[1:3]
subset.loc[:, "a"] = np.array([10, 11], dtype="int64")
subset._mgr._verify_integrity()
expected = DataFrame(
{"a": [10, 11], "b": [5, 6], "c": np.array([8, 9], dtype=dtype)},
index=range(1, 3),
)
> tm.assert_frame_equal(subset, expected)
E AssertionError: Attributes of DataFrame.iloc[:, 0] (column name="a") are different
E
E Attribute "dtype" are different
E [left]: int64
E [right]: Int64 If I switch the indexing method to subset["a"] = np.array([10, 11], dtype="int64") (instead of subset.loc[:, "a"]) and run the test with the original code (without my alterations), the test fails with the exact same error as mine. My question is: if, according to the issue, the only indexing method providing the correct output is using the name of the column itself, i.e. subset["a"], and when running it the test fails, could this test be wrong? Thank you in advance |
@MarcoGorelli I think this is a duplicate of #52593 since the int equivalent of df = pd.DataFrame({'a': [1,2,3]}, dtype='int64')
df.loc[:, 'a'] = df.loc[:, 'a'].astype('int32')
print(df.dtypes) # a is still int64 also doesn't change the dtype |
Pandas version checks
I have checked that this issue has not already been reported.
I have confirmed this bug exists on the latest version of pandas.
I have confirmed this bug exists on the main branch of pandas.
Reproducible Example
Issue Description
Conversion of columns (/rows) between datetime dtypes with different precision does not change the datatype of the columns (except for in the simplest case).
The absurd is that if I were to change the dtype of the "value" column in the above example, all of these example would've worked.
Expected Behavior
All printouts should be the same as the first:
Installed Versions
INSTALLED VERSIONS
commit : bdc79c1
python : 3.9.18.final.0
python-bits : 64
OS : Linux
OS-release : 5.15.0-91-generic
Version : #101~20.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Thu Nov 16 14:22:28 UTC 2023
machine : x86_64
processor : x86_64
byteorder : little
LC_ALL : None
LANG : en_IL
LOCALE : en_IL.UTF-8
pandas : 2.2.1
numpy : 1.24.4
pytz : 2023.3.post1
dateutil : 2.8.2
setuptools : 68.2.2
pip : 23.3
Cython : 3.0.6
pytest : 7.4.3
hypothesis : None
sphinx : None
blosc : None
feather : None
xlsxwriter : None
lxml.etree : None
html5lib : None
pymysql : None
psycopg2 : None
jinja2 : None
IPython : None
pandas_datareader : None
adbc-driver-postgresql: None
adbc-driver-sqlite : None
bs4 : None
bottleneck : None
dataframe-api-compat : None
fastparquet : None
fsspec : None
gcsfs : None
matplotlib : None
numba : None
numexpr : 2.8.6
odfpy : None
openpyxl : None
pandas_gbq : None
pyarrow : None
pyreadstat : None
python-calamine : None
pyxlsb : None
s3fs : None
scipy : None
sqlalchemy : None
tables : None
tabulate : None
xarray : None
xlrd : None
zstandard : None
tzdata : 2023.3
qtpy : None
pyqt5 : None
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: