Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(linter): add allowReject option to unicorn/no-useless-promise-resolve-reject #7274

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 14, 2024

Conversation

no-yan
Copy link
Contributor

@no-yan no-yan commented Nov 13, 2024

followup to #7232.

I'll keep this draft until #7232 is merged.

Copy link

graphite-app bot commented Nov 13, 2024

Your org has enabled the Graphite merge queue for merging into main

Add the label “0-merge” to the PR and Graphite will automatically add it to the merge queue when it’s ready to merge. Or use the label “hotfix” to add to the merge queue as a hot fix.

You must have a Graphite account and log in to Graphite in order to use the merge queue. Sign up using this link.

@github-actions github-actions bot added A-linter Area - Linter C-cleanup Category - technical debt or refactoring. Solution not expected to change behavior labels Nov 13, 2024
Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Nov 13, 2024

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #7274 will not alter performance

Comparing no-yan:chore/add-allow-resolve-option (fd06247) with main (84038ee)

Summary

✅ 30 untouched benchmarks

Copy link
Contributor

@camc314 camc314 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

Boshen pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 14, 2024
…ise/no-return-wrap` (#7232)

part of #4655

### Summary

Logic has been added to handle bind functions, unifying the
implementations of `unicorn/no-useless-promise-resolve-reject` and
`promise/no-return-wrap`.
This enables detection of the following code:

```javascript
foo().then((function() { return Promise.resolve(4) }).bind(this))
```

Merging this PR will allow this rule to pass all test cases of
promise/no-return-wrap without options. Additionally, merging #7274 will
ensure that all test cases are passed.
@no-yan no-yan force-pushed the chore/add-allow-resolve-option branch from 9b9f220 to 3160e4d Compare November 14, 2024 12:59
@no-yan no-yan force-pushed the chore/add-allow-resolve-option branch from 5c2a833 to fd06247 Compare November 14, 2024 13:18
@no-yan no-yan requested a review from camc314 November 14, 2024 13:18
@no-yan no-yan marked this pull request as ready for review November 14, 2024 13:18
@no-yan
Copy link
Contributor Author

no-yan commented Nov 14, 2024

@camc314 Thank you. I’ve made the revisions; could you please take another look?

Copy link
Contributor

@camc314 camc314 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thank you!

@camc314 camc314 merged commit 01ddf37 into oxc-project:main Nov 14, 2024
27 checks passed
Dunqing pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 17, 2024
…ise/no-return-wrap` (#7232)

part of #4655

### Summary

Logic has been added to handle bind functions, unifying the
implementations of `unicorn/no-useless-promise-resolve-reject` and
`promise/no-return-wrap`.
This enables detection of the following code:

```javascript
foo().then((function() { return Promise.resolve(4) }).bind(this))
```

Merging this PR will allow this rule to pass all test cases of
promise/no-return-wrap without options. Additionally, merging #7274 will
ensure that all test cases are passed.
Dunqing pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 17, 2024
Dunqing pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 18, 2024
…ise/no-return-wrap` (#7232)

part of #4655

### Summary

Logic has been added to handle bind functions, unifying the
implementations of `unicorn/no-useless-promise-resolve-reject` and
`promise/no-return-wrap`.
This enables detection of the following code:

```javascript
foo().then((function() { return Promise.resolve(4) }).bind(this))
```

Merging this PR will allow this rule to pass all test cases of
promise/no-return-wrap without options. Additionally, merging #7274 will
ensure that all test cases are passed.
Dunqing pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 18, 2024
Dunqing pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 18, 2024
…ise/no-return-wrap` (#7232)

part of #4655

### Summary

Logic has been added to handle bind functions, unifying the
implementations of `unicorn/no-useless-promise-resolve-reject` and
`promise/no-return-wrap`.
This enables detection of the following code:

```javascript
foo().then((function() { return Promise.resolve(4) }).bind(this))
```

Merging this PR will allow this rule to pass all test cases of
promise/no-return-wrap without options. Additionally, merging #7274 will
ensure that all test cases are passed.
Dunqing pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 18, 2024
Boshen added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 20, 2024
## [0.12.0] - 2024-11-20

- 20d9080 linter: [**BREAKING**] Override plugins array when passed in
config file (#7303) (camchenry)

### Features

- 1d9f528 linter: Implement `unicorn/prefer-string-raw` lint rule
(#7335) (Ryan Walker)
- d445e0f linter: Implement `unicorn/consistent-existence-index-check`
(#7262) (Ryan Walker)
- 01ddf37 linter: Add `allowReject` option to
`no-useless-promise-resolve-reject` (#7274) (no-yan)
- 755a31b linter: Support bind function case for compatibility with
`promise/no-return-wrap` (#7232) (no-yan)
- 428770e linter: Add `import/no-namespace` rule (#7229) (Dmitry
Zakharov)
- 9c91151 linter: Implement typescript/no-empty-object-type (#6977)
(Orenbek)
- 2268a0e linter: Support `overrides` config field (#6974) (DonIsaac)
- 3dcac1a linter: React/exhaustive-deps (#7151) (camc314)
- d3a0119 oxlint: Add `cwd` property to `LintRunner` (#7352) (Alexander
S.)

### Bug Fixes

- ba0b2ff editor: Reload workspace configuration after change (#7302)
(Alexander S.)
- bc0e72c linter: Handle user variables correctly for import/no_commonjs
(#7316) (Dmitry Zakharov)
- bf839c1 linter: False positive in `jest/expect-expect` (#7341)
(dalaoshu)
- ff2a1d4 linter: Move `exhaustive-deps` to `react` (#7251) (camc314)
- df5c535 linter: Revert unmatched rule error (#7257) (Cameron A
McHenry)
- c4ed230 linter: Fix false positive in eslint/no-cond-assign (#7241)
(camc314)
- ef847da linter: False positive in `jsx-a11y/iframe-has-title` (#7253)
(dalaoshu)
- 62b6327 linter: React/exhaustive-deps update span for unknown deps
diagnostic (#7249) (camc314)

### Documentation

- 4c124a8 editor/vscode: Update VS Code readme with installation
instructions and available features (#7306) (Nicholas Rayburn)

### Refactor

- c6a4868 linter: Temporarily remove unknown rules checking (#7260)
(camchenry)

### Testing

- 5190b7f editor: Add test setup (#7361) (Alexander S.)

Co-authored-by: Boshen <1430279+Boshen@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-linter Area - Linter C-cleanup Category - technical debt or refactoring. Solution not expected to change behavior
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants