-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 482
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[WIP] feat(linter): add eslint/no-unused-vars
#642
Closed
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
DonIsaac
added
C-enhancement
Category - New feature or request
A-linter
Area - Linter
labels
Jul 27, 2023
You may draft this to reduce some noise. |
not fully complete, still has some bugs
blocked by #660 |
DonIsaac
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 31, 2023
Adds `AstKind::debug_name()`, which returns the name of an AstKind struct with a few minor details as applicable. I intentionally did not make `AstKind` implement `Display`, as this method returns minimal information. Additionally, this method only exists in debug builds. I've hidden it behind a `#[cfg(debug_assertions)]`, so it won't affect release builds. This code was extracted from #642, where it as created while debugging iteration over ancestor nodes. I figured it belonged in its own PR and may be useful to other devs.
Note to self: merge some of this and close this PR. |
After inspecting this PR closely, it seems like this is in a unmergable state, so I'll close this for now. Thank you for working on this @DonIsaac! I think we have the semantic data for reading unused vars now. |
11 tasks
Dunqing
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 31, 2024
> Re-creation of #4427 due to rebasing issues. Original attempt: #642 ----- Third time's the charm? Each time I attempt this rule, I find a bunch of bugs in `Semantic`, and I expect this attempt to be no different. Expect sidecar issues+PRs stemming from this PR here. ## Not Supported These are cases supported in the original eslint rule, but that I'm intentionally deciding not to support - export comments in scripts ```js /* exported a */ var a; ``` - global comments ```js /* global a */ var a; ``` ## Behavior Changes These are intentional deviations from the original rule's behavior: - logical re-assignments are not considered usages ```js // passes in eslint/no-unused-vars, fails in this implementation let a = 0; a ||= 1; let b = 0; b &&= 2; let c = undefined; c ??= [] ``` ## Known Limitations - Lint rules do not have babel or tsconfig information, meaning we can't determine if `React` imports are being used or not. The relevant tsconfig settings here are `jsx`, `jsxPragma`, and `jsxFragmentName`. To accommodate this, all imports to symbols named `React` or `h` are ignored in JSX files. - References to symbols used in JSDoc `{@link}` tags are not created, so symbols that are only used in doc comments will be reported as unused. See: #4443 - `.vue` files are skipped completely, since variables can be used in templates in ways we cannot detect > note: `.d.ts` files are skipped as well. ## Todo - [x] Skip unused TS enum members on used enums - [x] Skip unused parameters followed by used variables in object/array spreads - [x] Re-assignments to array/object spreads do not respect `destructuredArrayIgnorePattern` (related to: #4435) - [x] #4493 - [x] References inside a nested scope are not considered usages (#4447) - [x] Port over typescript-eslint test cases _(wip, they've been copied and I'm slowly enabling them)_ - [x] Handle constructor properties ```ts class Foo { constructor(public a) {} // `a` should be allowed } ``` - [x] Read references in sequence expressions (that are not in the last position) should not count as a usage ```js let a = 0; let b = (a++, 0); console.log(b) ``` > Honestly, is anyone even writing code like this? - [x] function overload signatures should not be reported - [x] Named functions returned from other functions get incorrectly reported as unused (found by @camc314) ```js function foo() { return function bar() { } } Foo()() ``` - [x] false positive for TS modules within ambient modules ```ts declare global { // incorrectly marked as unused namespace jest { } } ``` ## Blockers - #4436 - #4437 - #4446 - #4447 - #4494 - #4495 ## Non-Blocking Issues - #4443 - #4475 (prevents checks on exported symbols from namespaces)
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes #595
Feature Todos
vars
vars: "local"
ignoreRestSiblings
caughtErrors
caughtErrorsIgnorePattern
optionfunctions and classes
function args
argsIgnorePattern
after-used
optionafter-used
is setBugs + Other Todos
In Rule
for in
loops should count as a valid read, e.g.(Possibly) in Semantic Analysis