Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Server Mode is broken since optyfr/jrommanager:3.0.0-beta.13 #277

Closed
L4R5 opened this issue Jun 12, 2024 · 3 comments
Closed

Server Mode is broken since optyfr/jrommanager:3.0.0-beta.13 #277

L4R5 opened this issue Jun 12, 2024 · 3 comments
Labels
good first issue Good for newcomers

Comments

@L4R5
Copy link

L4R5 commented Jun 12, 2024

I tried the server mode using the docker container. Since optyfr/jrommanager:3.0.0-beta.13 it prints out the following error message after opening the server url in a web browser

logs.txt

@optyfr optyfr added the good first issue Good for newcomers label Jun 15, 2024
@optyfr
Copy link
Owner

optyfr commented Jun 15, 2024

There seems to be a bug in Jetty 12 for some specific use case :

  • when resource as a gzip precompressed version to serve
  • when resource is also in a jar file archive
  • when this jar is served as a ResourceURL

The bug is still there for jetty 12.0.8, I have to try with latest 12.0.10

if it's still present, I will create an issue for jetty team and after this, here is the solutions possible :

  • wait for issue to be resolved and released (may be long)
  • disable precompressed headers in the hope that there is no other etag problem elsewhere (fast resolution but not guaranteed and will slow down loading)
  • step back to jetty 11 (big work, not desired)

@optyfr
Copy link
Owner

optyfr commented Jun 15, 2024

@optyfr
Copy link
Owner

optyfr commented Jun 23, 2024

fixed in release 3.0.4

@optyfr optyfr closed this as completed Jun 23, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
good first issue Good for newcomers
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants