fix：adjust editor style #901
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes involve modifications to three Vue components: Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
packages/plugins/state/src/CreateStore.vue (2)
Line range hint
1-385: Consider architectural improvements for better maintainability.While the component is well-structured, consider the following improvements:
- Extract Monaco editor setup into a reusable component to reduce duplication between state, getters, and actions sections.
- Move validation logic into a composable function for better reusability.
- Abstract editor content parsing into utility functions.
This would improve maintainability and reduce code duplication.
Example structure:
// composables/useStoreValidation.ts export function useStoreValidation(dataSource, flag, updateKey) { const validateName = (rule, name, callback) => { // ... existing validation logic } return { validateName } } // components/StoreEditor.vue export default { props: { type: String, // 'state' | 'getters' | 'actions' value: String, options: Object } // ... editor specific logic } // utils/editorParser.ts export function parseEditorContent(content) { // ... existing parsing logic }
Line range hint
196-204: Enhance error handling in editor content validation.The
editorDidMountfunction's validation of editor content could be improved:
- The function returns a boolean but doesn't handle invalid JSON.
- The string replacements could be simplified using a single regex.
Consider this improvement:
- const editorDidMount = () => { - const variable = variableEditor.value - .getEditor() - .getValue() - .replace(new RegExp('\\r\\n', 'g', ''), '') - .replace(/\s/g, '') - - return Object.prototype.toString.call(variable) === '[object Object]' - } + const editorDidMount = () => { + try { + const variable = JSON.parse( + variableEditor.value + .getEditor() + .getValue() + .replace(/[\r\n\s]/g, '') + ) + return typeof variable === 'object' && variable !== null + } catch (error) { + console.error('Invalid JSON in editor:', error) + return false + } + }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
packages/common/component/VueMonaco.vue(0 hunks)packages/plugins/state/src/CreateStore.vue(1 hunks)packages/plugins/state/src/CreateVariable.vue(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- packages/common/component/VueMonaco.vue
🔇 Additional comments (2)
packages/plugins/state/src/CreateStore.vue (1)
261-261: LGTM: Consistent toolbar positioning.
The adjustment to the toolbar's right position aligns with the PR's objective of improving editor styles and maintains consistency with similar changes in other components.
packages/plugins/state/src/CreateVariable.vue (1)
419-419: LGTM: Consistent toolbar alignment.
The adjustment of the toolbar's right position from 4px to 20px aligns with similar changes in other components, maintaining UI consistency across the application.
English | 简体中文
PR
PR Checklist
Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:
PR Type
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Background and solution
What is the current behavior?
Issue Number: N/A
What is the new behavior?
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
Other information
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Style