OCPBUGS-30266: fix: introduce minimum allocation sizes

[jakobmoellerdev]

This introduces minimum allocation sizing on the topolvm controller server equivalent to our upstream. The difference here is that we set our own limits so that we can later transition to a more dynamic configuration if required. For now the minimum limits should suffice.

[openshift-ci]

Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request.
If you want CI signal for your change, please convert it to an actual PR.
You can still manually trigger a test run with /test all

[openshift-ci-robot]

@jakobmoellerdev: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-30266, which is invalid:

• expected the bug to target the "4.16.0" version, but no target version was set

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

This introduces minimum allocation sizing on the topolvm controller server equivalent to our upstream. The difference here is that we set our own limits so that we can later transition to a more dynamic configuration if required. For now the minimum limits should suffice.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[jakobmoellerdev]

/test all

[jakobmoellerdev]

/override ci/prow/snyk-deps

[openshift-ci]

@jakobmoellerdev: Overrode contexts on behalf of jakobmoellerdev: ci/prow/snyk-deps

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/snyk-deps

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[jakobmoellerdev]

/test all

[jakobmoellerdev]

/test unit-test

[jakobmoellerdev]

/override ci/prow/snyk-deps

[openshift-ci]

@jakobmoellerdev: Overrode contexts on behalf of jakobmoellerdev: ci/prow/snyk-deps

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/snyk-deps

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[openshift-ci]

@jakobmoellerdev: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

[jeff-roche]

/lgtm

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jakobmoellerdev, jeff-roche

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [jakobmoellerdev,jeff-roche]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[jakobmoellerdev]

/jira refresh

[openshift-ci-robot]

@jakobmoellerdev: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-30266, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug

• bug is open, matching expected state (open)
• bug target version (4.16.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.16.0)
• bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @radeore

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@jakobmoellerdev: An error was encountered updating to the MODIFIED state for bug OCPBUGS-30266 on the Jira server at https://issues.redhat.com/. No known errors were detected, please see the full error message for details.

Full error message.

No response returned: Get "https://issues.redhat.com/rest/api/2/issue/OCPBUGS-30266/transitions?expand=transitions.fields": GET https://issues.redhat.com/rest/api/2/issue/OCPBUGS-30266/transitions?expand=transitions.fields giving up after 5 attempt(s)

Please contact an administrator to resolve this issue, then request a bug refresh with /jira refresh.

In response to this:

This introduces minimum allocation sizing on the topolvm controller server equivalent to our upstream. The difference here is that we set our own limits so that we can later transition to a more dynamic configuration if required. For now the minimum limits should suffice.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[jakobmoellerdev]

/jira refresh

[openshift-ci-robot]

@jakobmoellerdev: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-30266: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

• openshift/lvm-operator#603

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-30266 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.