|
| 1 | +--- |
| 2 | +title: generated-resource-types |
| 3 | +authors: |
| 4 | + - "@logonoff" |
| 5 | +reviewers: |
| 6 | + - "@jhadvig" |
| 7 | + - "@spadgett" |
| 8 | +approvers: |
| 9 | + - "@spadgett" |
| 10 | +api-approvers: |
| 11 | + - "None" |
| 12 | +creation-date: 2025-09-16 |
| 13 | +last-updated: 2025-09-25 |
| 14 | +tracking-link: |
| 15 | + - https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CONSOLE-4775 |
| 16 | +--- |
| 17 | + |
| 18 | +# Migration to generated resource types from their OpenAPI specs |
| 19 | + |
| 20 | +## Summary |
| 21 | + |
| 22 | +The OpenShift web console interacts with various Kubernetes (k8s) resources to |
| 23 | +provide its functionality. The schemas of these resources which are used by the |
| 24 | +web console to interact with the k8s API are currently manually defined as TypeScript |
| 25 | +types in the `frontend/public/module/k8s/types.ts` file. |
| 26 | + |
| 27 | +These types are often not reviewed for accuracy or completeness, and may not |
| 28 | +always align with the actual OpenAPI specifications of the resources. This leads |
| 29 | +to bugs in the web console due to incorrect assumptions about the structure of |
| 30 | +the resources. |
| 31 | + |
| 32 | +This enhancement proposes the addition of automated generation of TypeScript types |
| 33 | +for Kubernetes resources used by the OpenShift web console. The goal is to ensure |
| 34 | +better alignment with the source-of-truth schemas, reduce manual effort, and minimize |
| 35 | +he risk of bugs due to schema misalignment. |
| 36 | + |
| 37 | +## Motivation |
| 38 | + |
| 39 | +The effort to manually maintain TypeScript resource types in the web console is |
| 40 | +cumbersome and error-prone, and is occasionally the cause of bugs due to misalignment |
| 41 | +between the actual resource schema and the manually defined TypeScript types. |
| 42 | + |
| 43 | +To address this, we propose adding automated generation of these TypeScript types |
| 44 | +based on the OpenAPI specifications of the k8s resources. This will ensure better |
| 45 | +alignment with the source-of-truth schemas, reduce manual effort, and minimize the |
| 46 | +risk of bugs due to schema misalignment. |
| 47 | + |
| 48 | + |
| 49 | +### User Stories |
| 50 | + |
| 51 | +* As an OpenShift engineer, I want accurate TypeScript types for k8s resources used |
| 52 | + by the web console, so that I can make correct assumptions about the structure of |
| 53 | + these resources when developing features. |
| 54 | +* As an OpenShift engineer, I want to reduce the manual effort required to maintain |
| 55 | + TypeScript types for k8s resources, so that I can focus on developing features |
| 56 | + rather than maintaining types. |
| 57 | + |
| 58 | +### Goals |
| 59 | + |
| 60 | +The current manual maintenance of TypeScript types was originally done in during |
| 61 | +the early development of the web console by CoreOS, when the web console was meant |
| 62 | +to be a simple management interface for k8s clusters. |
| 63 | + |
| 64 | +The goals of this enhancement are to: |
| 65 | + |
| 66 | +* Periodically publish a package on npm which contains TypeScript types for k8s |
| 67 | + resources used by the web console, based on their OpenAPI specifications. |
| 68 | +* Consume this package in the web console and in associated console dynamic plugins. |
| 69 | + |
| 70 | +### Non-Goals |
| 71 | + |
| 72 | +This enhancement will not seek to implement: |
| 73 | + |
| 74 | +* Validation of objects against the generated types during runtime. |
| 75 | +* Generation of types for all CustomResourceDefinitions (CRDs) used by the web console. |
| 76 | + The initial focus will be on resources defined by the `openshift/kubernetes` |
| 77 | + swagger definitions and the CRDs defined by the `openshift/api` repository. |
| 78 | + |
| 79 | +## Proposal |
| 80 | + |
| 81 | +### Workflow Description |
| 82 | + |
| 83 | +**library authors** are responsible for maintaining the type generation library. |
| 84 | +1. They will run the generation scripts at some point during the OpenShift release |
| 85 | +2. The generated types will be published to a package on npm (e.g. `@openshift/k8s-types`) |
| 86 | + |
| 87 | +**web console developers** will consume the generated types in the web console. |
| 88 | +1. They will add or update the dependency to the package in the web console's `package.json`. |
| 89 | +2. They will import the types from the package in the web console's codebase. |
| 90 | +3. They will fix resulting type errors in the web console's codebase due to |
| 91 | + changes in the generated types. |
| 92 | + |
| 93 | + |
| 94 | +### API Extensions |
| 95 | +NA |
| 96 | + |
| 97 | +### Risks and Mitigations |
| 98 | + |
| 99 | +The proposal aims to mitigate risks which already exist and have manifested through |
| 100 | +various bugs. |
| 101 | + |
| 102 | +### Drawbacks |
| 103 | + |
| 104 | +* Web console developers would loose unlimited control over types which are used |
| 105 | + in the codebase. |
| 106 | +* The current implementation of the generated types replaces the `K8sResourceCommon` |
| 107 | + `type` with an `interface`, which aligns with TypeScript's recommendations. However, |
| 108 | + this may cause some type errors in the web console and dependent dynamic plugins |
| 109 | + which will need to be fixed. The type errors often occur when the `omit` utility |
| 110 | + function in Lodash is used on objects of type `K8sResourceCommon`. However, |
| 111 | + this is mitigated by the fact that TypeScript is compiled away during build time, |
| 112 | + so the runtime behavior of the web console will not be affected. |
| 113 | + |
| 114 | +## Test Plan |
| 115 | + |
| 116 | +As this enhancement proposal focuses on the generation of TypeScript types, |
| 117 | +existing unit and integration tests that utilize these types will serve as the |
| 118 | +primary means of validation. To ensure the correctness of the generated types, |
| 119 | +we will implement the following test strategies: |
| 120 | + |
| 121 | +* **Unit tests in the generation library**: We will add unit tests to the type |
| 122 | + generation library to verify that it correctly transforms OpenAPI specifications |
| 123 | + into TypeScript types. |
| 124 | +* **Integration tests in the web console**: We will leverage existing unit and |
| 125 | + integration tests in the web console that utilize the generated types. These |
| 126 | + tests will help ensure that the generated types are accurate and function as |
| 127 | + expected within the context of the web console. |
| 128 | +* **Manual verification**: We will perform manual verification of the generated |
| 129 | + types by inspecting them and comparing them to the original OpenAPI definitions. |
| 130 | + |
| 131 | +## Graduation Criteria |
| 132 | +N/A |
| 133 | + |
| 134 | +### Dev Preview -> Tech Preview |
| 135 | +N/A |
| 136 | + |
| 137 | +### Tech Preview -> GA |
| 138 | +N/A |
| 139 | + |
| 140 | +### Removing a deprecated feature |
| 141 | +N/A |
| 142 | + |
| 143 | +## Upgrade / Downgrade Strategy |
| 144 | +N/A |
| 145 | + |
| 146 | +## Version Skew Strategy |
| 147 | + |
| 148 | +Updating the types package should only affect the contents of the types when |
| 149 | +they are updated by the source resource specifications. As such, version skew |
| 150 | +is mitigated by OpenShift's policy of not breaking APIs. |
| 151 | + |
| 152 | +However, when breaking changes do occur, older versions of resource types can |
| 153 | +still be exported by the type library to ensure backwards-compatibility with |
| 154 | +existing web console code and resources. |
| 155 | + |
| 156 | +## Operational Aspects of API Extensions |
| 157 | +N/A |
| 158 | + |
| 159 | +### Deprecated Feature |
| 160 | +N/A |
| 161 | + |
| 162 | +### Topology Considerations |
| 163 | +N/A |
| 164 | + |
| 165 | +#### Hypershift / Hosted Control Planes |
| 166 | +N/A |
| 167 | + |
| 168 | +#### Standalone Clusters |
| 169 | +N/A |
| 170 | + |
| 171 | +#### Single-node Deployments or MicroShift |
| 172 | +N/A |
| 173 | + |
| 174 | +## Support Procedures |
| 175 | +N/A |
| 176 | + |
| 177 | +### Implementation Details/Notes/Constraints |
| 178 | + |
| 179 | +A proof of concept for generating these types was written in [logonoff/openshift-types]. |
| 180 | +While these types align with the web console naming conventions, there are changes |
| 181 | +which cause type errors when directly replaced with the web console equivalents. |
| 182 | + |
| 183 | +[kubernetes-model-ts]: https://github.com/tommy351/kubernetes-models-ts |
| 184 | +[logonoff/openshift-types]: https://github.com/logonoff/openshift-types |
| 185 | + |
| 186 | +#### Steps to Implement This Feature |
| 187 | + |
| 188 | +1. **Develop the type generation library**: Create a library that can fetch OpenAPI |
| 189 | + specifications and generate TypeScript types from them. This library should be |
| 190 | + capable of handling both core k8s resources and CRDs defined by the `openshift/api` |
| 191 | + repository. This library will be located in a separate repository from both `openshift/api` |
| 192 | + and `openshift/console`. |
| 193 | + |
| 194 | +2. **Integrate the generation process into the OpenShift release cycle**: Determine |
| 195 | + the appropriate point in the OpenShift release cycle to run the type generation |
| 196 | + scripts and publish the generated types to a package on npm. |
| 197 | +3. **Update the web console to consume the generated types**: Add or update the |
| 198 | + dependency to the generated types package in the web console's `package.json`, |
| 199 | + and update the web console's codebase to import and use the generated types. |
| 200 | +4. **Fix type errors in the web console**: Address any type errors that arise in |
| 201 | + the web console's codebase due to changes in the generated types. |
| 202 | + |
| 203 | +## Alternatives (Not Implemented) |
| 204 | + |
| 205 | +Prior art exists in the form of npm packages containing TypeScript types for k8s |
| 206 | +resources, such as [kubernetes-model-ts]. This package is used by already used |
| 207 | +and has contributors from Red Hat Developer Hub (based on Backstage); however, |
| 208 | +these packages do not cover OpenShift CustomResourceDefinitions. |
| 209 | + |
| 210 | +Moreover, the type names and overall implementation of the types do not align with |
| 211 | +the status quo we have in the web console. This would require further work in the |
| 212 | +web console to both adapt to the new type and to implement the OpenShift-specific |
| 213 | +CustomResourceDefinitions in the upstream library. |
| 214 | + |
| 215 | +## Open Questions |
| 216 | + |
| 217 | +1. OpenShift web console currently uses manually defined TypeScript types for k8s |
| 218 | + resources, which assume that all resources share the same version. How should |
| 219 | + we handle resources that may exist in different versions (e.g., `v1`, |
| 220 | + `v1beta1`, etc.)? |
| 221 | + - One approach could be to ensure that the code consuming these types can safely |
| 222 | + assume a specific version (e.g., the latest available version), and to request |
| 223 | + the API server to return resources in that version. |
0 commit comments