Provide a shortname to imagecontentsourcepolicy

[bmillemathias-1a]

This is really boring to type this long name so often as a sysadmin.
Saving people from typing 20 letters x N times a day makes me happy.
Not sure this is as easy as adding this single line,

Please if you could back-port that to any release downward to 4.3.

fixes #622

[openshift-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: bmillemathias-1a
To complete the pull request process, please assign jwforres
You can assign the PR to them by writing /assign @jwforres in a comment when ready.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[openshift-ci-robot]

Hi @bmillemathias-1a. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a openshift member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[bmillemathias-1a]

/assign @jwforres

[bmillemathias]

any feedback on this ?

[jwforres]

@mrunalp was an api short name proposed at all for icsp's?

[mrunalp]

@jwforres Not when we first added it IIRC, but icsp sounds good since that's what everyone uses to refer to it.

[bmillemathias]

@jwforres Not when we first added it IIRC, but icsp sounds good since that's what everyone uses to refer to it.

any update to get this merged ?

[openshift-bot]

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.

Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.
Exclude this issue from closing by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle stale

[openshift-bot]

Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity.

Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Rotten issues close after an additional 30d of inactivity.
Exclude this issue from closing by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle rotten
/remove-lifecycle stale

[bmillemathias]

/lifecycle frozen

[bmillemathias]

Hello @mrunalp
Any update on this considering this is a tiny patch