Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Backport 2.x] Add score based password verification #2784

Conversation

willyborankin
Copy link
Collaborator

Backport 15860b6 from #2557

Signed-off-by: Andrey Pleskach <ples@aiven.io>
@willyborankin willyborankin force-pushed the backport-score-based-password-verification branch from 46302b7 to 4e69a2f Compare May 22, 2023 17:14
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 22, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #2784 (4e69a2f) into 2.x (fa33fc5) will increase coverage by 0.05%.
The diff coverage is 84.69%.

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##                2.x    #2784      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     61.15%   61.20%   +0.05%     
- Complexity     3306     3312       +6     
============================================
  Files           263      264       +1     
  Lines         18431    18507      +76     
  Branches       3259     3265       +6     
============================================
+ Hits          11272    11328      +56     
- Misses         5585     5599      +14     
- Partials       1574     1580       +6     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
...g/opensearch/security/support/ConfigConstants.java 94.44% <ø> (ø)
...ity/dlic/rest/validation/CredentialsValidator.java 70.00% <63.63%> (+4.21%) ⬆️
...curity/dlic/rest/validation/PasswordValidator.java 84.05% <84.05%> (ø)
.../opensearch/security/OpenSearchSecurityPlugin.java 80.31% <100.00%> (+0.19%) ⬆️
...est/validation/AbstractConfigurationValidator.java 83.64% <100.00%> (+1.09%) ⬆️

... and 6 files with indirect coverage changes

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants