Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixing inline javadocs usage in PaginationStrategy #16428

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 22, 2024

Conversation

gargharsh3134
Copy link
Contributor

@gargharsh3134 gargharsh3134 commented Oct 22, 2024

Description

Fixes the usage of inline javadocs in paginationStrategy interface causing build failures on older jdk versions.

Related Issues

Resolves #16374

Check List

  • Functionality includes testing.
  • API changes companion pull request created, if applicable.
  • Public documentation issue/PR created, if applicable.

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
For more information on following Developer Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check here.

Signed-off-by: Harsh Garg <gkharsh@amazon.com>
Copy link
Contributor

✅ Gradle check result for fce79de: SUCCESS

Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 22, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 72.03%. Comparing base (0419e5d) to head (fce79de).
Report is 10 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main   #16428      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     72.05%   72.03%   -0.03%     
+ Complexity    64874    64776      -98     
============================================
  Files          5308     5308              
  Lines        302727   302727              
  Branches      43734    43734              
============================================
- Hits         218137   218076      -61     
+ Misses        66737    66711      -26     
- Partials      17853    17940      +87     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Member

@dbwiddis dbwiddis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! Thanks for the quick fix!

@dbwiddis dbwiddis added skip-changelog backport 2.x Backport to 2.x branch labels Oct 22, 2024
@dbwiddis dbwiddis merged commit 20e233e into opensearch-project:main Oct 22, 2024
72 of 74 checks passed
opensearch-trigger-bot bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 22, 2024
Signed-off-by: Harsh Garg <gkharsh@amazon.com>
Co-authored-by: Harsh Garg <gkharsh@amazon.com>
(cherry picked from commit 20e233e)
Signed-off-by: github-actions[bot] <github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
dbwiddis pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 22, 2024
(cherry picked from commit 20e233e)

Signed-off-by: Harsh Garg <gkharsh@amazon.com>
Signed-off-by: github-actions[bot] <github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Harsh Garg <gkharsh@amazon.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport 2.x Backport to 2.x branch bug Something isn't working Other skip-changelog
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[BUG] Invalid javadoc in PaginationStrategy class prevents OpenSearch compiling with javadocs
2 participants