Enable test CardinalityWithRequestBreakerIT.testRequestBreaker after lucene 99 upgrade

[neetikasinghal]

Description

Enabling the test as the memory leak wouldn't happen after lucene 99 upgrade as explained here

Validated that the required lucene change is present and ran the test with relevant seed for 500 times to ensure successful runs.

Related Issues

Resolves #10154

Check List

• New functionality includes testing.
  • All tests pass
• New functionality has been documented.
  • New functionality has javadoc added
• Failing checks are inspected and point to the corresponding known issue(s) (See: Troubleshooting Failing Builds)
• Commits are signed per the DCO using --signoff
• Commit changes are listed out in CHANGELOG.md file (See: Changelog)
• Public documentation issue/PR created

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
For more information on following Developer Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check here.

[neetikasinghal]

@reta / @sohami this is just one line change, ready to be merged once the workflow turns green.

[github-actions]

Compatibility status:

Checks if related components are compatible with change 46e3313

Incompatible components

Incompatible components: [https://github.com/opensearch-project/security-analytics.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/custom-codecs.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/k-nn.git]

Skipped components

Compatible components

Compatible components: [https://github.com/opensearch-project/asynchronous-search.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/observability.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/notifications.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/reporting.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/job-scheduler.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/opensearch-oci-object-storage.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/common-utils.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/neural-search.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/geospatial.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/anomaly-detection.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/security.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/ml-commons.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/index-management.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/cross-cluster-replication.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/alerting.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/performance-analyzer-rca.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/sql.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/performance-analyzer.git]

[github-actions]

❌ Gradle check result for 46e3313: FAILURE

Please examine the workflow log, locate, and copy-paste the failure(s) below, then iterate to green. Is the failure a flaky test unrelated to your change?

[reta]

❌ Gradle check result for 46e3313: FAILURE

#11547

[github-actions]

❕ Gradle check result for 46e3313: UNSTABLE

• TEST FAILURES:

      1 org.opensearch.search.SearchWeightedRoutingIT.testShardRoutingWithNetworkDisruption_FailOpenEnabled

Please review all flaky tests that succeeded after retry and create an issue if one does not already exist to track the flaky failure.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (feeb595) 71.36% compared to head (46e3313) 71.37%.
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main   #11841      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     71.36%   71.37%   +0.01%     
- Complexity    59304    59326      +22     
============================================
  Files          4919     4919              
  Lines        278912   278912              
  Branches      40543    40543              
============================================
+ Hits         199052   199083      +31     
+ Misses        63337    63263      -74     
- Partials      16523    16566      +43     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[kotwanikunal]

@neetikasinghal Do you want to backport it to 2.x as well?

[neetikasinghal]

@neetikasinghal Do you want to backport it to 2.x as well?

@kotwanikunal thanks for merging, yes I have just added the label for it.