[CI] Fix BWC related CI failures by swapping dist url with snapshot url

[manasvinibs]

Description

The BWC tests on 2.x are failing: https://github.com/opensearch-project/OpenSearch-Dashboards/actions/runs/5895740470/job/16189125311.

BWC test files: https://github.com/opensearch-project/OpenSearch-Dashboards/blob/main/.github/workflows/build_and_test_workflow.yml#L349 utilize the release artifact which is built by a configuration sent externally. If there are issues in the build release for OpenSearch then we will be impacted, where snapshot is built more frequently.

Issues Resolved

#4814

Check List

• All tests pass
  • yarn test:jest
  • yarn test:jest_integration
  • yarn test:ftr
• New functionality includes testing.
• New functionality has been documented.
• Update CHANGELOG.md
• Commits are signed per the DCO using --signoff

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #4828 (28d4261) into 2.x (dee93c9) will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##              2.x    #4828   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   66.11%   66.12%           
=======================================
  Files        3315     3315           
  Lines       63909    63909           
  Branches    10126    10126           
=======================================
+ Hits        42256    42257    +1     
  Misses      19168    19168           
+ Partials     2485     2484    -1     

Flag	Coverage Δ
Linux_1	34.77% <ø> (ø)
Linux_2	55.10% <ø> (ø)
Linux_3	43.02% <ø> (?)
Linux_4	35.08% <ø> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
Windows_1	34.79% <ø> (ø)
Windows_2	55.06% <ø> (ø)
Windows_3	43.03% <ø> (ø)
Windows_4	35.08% <ø> (+<0.01%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

see 1 file with indirect coverage changes

[AMoo-Miki]

Thanks Mana. While this PR is temporary, a future version will first attempt to use dist and if that fails, it will fallback to snapshots. If we dont have an issue tracking that, we should create one.

[manasvinibs]

Thanks Mana. While this PR is temporary, a future version will first attempt to use dist and if that fails, it will fallback to snapshots. If we dont have an issue tracking that, we should create one.

Yes, we have this issue #4828

[kavilla]

@manasvinibs should we forward port this?

[manasvinibs]

@manasvinibs should we forward port this?

Good call! Yes, added the label.