-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
/
ORNL-TM-3138.txt
4622 lines (2830 loc) · 114 KB
/
ORNL-TM-3138.txt
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
2o
tr i g
TIN MARIET
i
RGY TEMS LIBRARIES
i
T
3 4456 0382732 1
T
This rehort was prepared as an account of work sponsored by the United
States Government. Neither the United States nor the United States Atomic
Energy Commission, nor any of their employees,: rnor any of their cohtram‘.ors,
subcontractors, or their employees, makes any warranty, express or impiied, or
assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completensess or
usefu!neés of any information, apparatus, product or process disclosed, of
represents that its use wouldf: not infringe privately owned rights.
ORNL~TM~3138
Contract No, W-7405-eng-26
ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT STUDIES FOR MOLTEN-SALT
BREEDER REACTOR PROCESSING NO. 3
L. E. McNeese
MAY 1971
OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY
Oak Ridge, Tennessee
operated by
UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION
for the
U.S. ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION
WG
3 yysk 0382732 1L
ii
Reports previously issued in this series are as follows:
ORNL~4204
ORNL-4234
ORNL~4235
ORNL-4364
ORNL~4365
ORNL-4366
ORNL-TM~3053
ORNL-TM-3137
Period ending
Period ending
Period ending
Period ending
Period ending
Period ending
Period ending
Period ending
June 1967
September 1967
December 1967
March 1968
June 1968
September 1968
December 1968
March 1969
CONTENTS
Page
SIMARIES » - 2 & . L] . » - o - a2 o - * ® » - - . - . * . - + & » l
1. IRTRODUCTION & ¢ & v & 4 o o o s o o s s o o s 2 o 2 s o s 5
2. REMOVAL OF PROTACTINIUM FROM A SINGLE-FLUID MSBR . . . . . . 6
2.1 Steady-State Performance for the Case of an MSBR Fueled
with Uranium . . ¢ o ¢ & v 4 o o o o o & o o o o o o o 8
2.2 Steady-State Performance for the Case of an MSBR Fueled
with Plutonium .+ + & « ¢ ¢ 4 & ¢ o o 4 o o 2 « o o « « o 11
3. EFFECT OF CHEMICAL PROCESSING ON THE NUCLEAR PERFORMANCE OF AN
MSBR & v v ¢ o o o o o o o o 2 o o o s o s 4 s s e e s e . . 14
3.1 Computational Procedure . . ¢« & 4 ¢« « o s+ « o o « s « o 16
3.2 Chemical Behavior of Fission Products and Actinides During
Processing o ¢ v o o 6 o o 0 4 s 6 o 4 e s s s s e s e o« 17
3.3 Calculated ResultsS . « . 4 « ¢ o o o o o & s o o o+ « + « 18
3.4 Discussion of Results . . « & « v & o v v o o o o + « o 29
4., REDUCTIVE EXTRACTION EXPERIMENTS IN A MILD-STEEL FLOW-THROUGH
FACILITY & v v 4 o o o o 4 s o o = o o o s « s s o o « « » o« 30
4.1 Addition of Thorium, and Subsequent Transfers of Thorium-
Bismuth Solution . . . e & s 2 s 3 & & &+ ® 3 & 3 2 4 s » 31
4.2 Addition of Salt, and Hyvdrofluorination of Salt and Bis-
1115 o Y. 241
4,3 Hydrodynamic Experiments: Runs HR-1 and -2 . . . . . . 35
4.4 Hydrodynamic Run HR-3 , . . . . « « . o « « « + « « . . 38
5. DIGITAL SIMULATION OF THE FLOW CONTROL SYSTEMS FOR THE REDUC~
TIVE EXTRACTION FACILITY . |, . . ¢ & v v 4 & o o s o &« « « « 139
5.1 Salt and Metal Feed Systems To Be Studied . . . . . . . 41
5.2 Mathematical Analysis . . ¢ & v v o « o s o o o« « o & o 41
5.3 Solution of Equations and Calculated Results . . . . . . 45
6. ELECTROLYTIC CELL DEVELOPMENT . . . . + v & o v + o o o v v . 50
iid
6.1 Formation of Frozen Salt Layers in Regions of High Heat
Generation . . . . & 4 ¢« o v 4 4 4 e e s e 4 e e s« . . 50
6.2 Use of Beryllium Oxide as an Electrical Insulator . . . 54
10.
11.
iv
CONTENTS (Continued)
Page
ANALYSIS OF MASS TRANSFER IN FLECTROLYTIC CELLS . . . . . . . 58
7.1 General Mathematical Model . . & ¢« ¢ v &« « « « s =« « « 59
7.2 Assumptions and Simplifications . . . . . . « . + . . . 08
7.3 Cathode Current Efficiencies and Maximum Current Densities
with LiFwBerwBin MiXLUTES v v v v o ¢ o o &+ o o« « « o« 09
AXTAL MIXING IN PACKED COLUMNS WITH HIGH-DENSITY FLUIDS . . . 72
8.1 Mathematical Model . . . . & &« ¢ ¢ v ¢ ¢ &« « o o« o o » 13
8.2 Experimental Equipment . . : + « o v ¢« v o s o o « o o 14
8.3 Results . . « « v v« v ¢ o 5 o v e e e e e e e e .78
REMOVAL OF HEAT FROM PACEED-COLUMN CONTACTORS USIED FOR ISC “U NG
PROTACTINIUM . . . ¢ v« 4o v v v v &« & o s & & o s« o o« . 18
9.1 Maximum Column Temperatures, Assuming Only Convection of
Heat s 4 . e * 2 2 3 & o . . . . . " - - - . - . . . . 81
9.2 Maximum Column Temperatures, Assuming Only Heat Removal
Througll t—he CO]-ulnn wall L] - <+ s » * - » . . . . . . . . 82
9.3 Conclusion . & « 4 « ¢« & « o + s+ & s &+ & o 4 8 e s 2+ 83
MSRE DISTILLATION EXPERIMENT . . . . & ¢ v ¢ 4 o« & o « s « o« 84
10.1 Summary of Distillation Operation . . . . . . + « « . . 84
10.2 Summary of Available Experimental Data . . . . . « . . 85
10.3 Material Balance Calculations . + + ¢ v « &« o« + « « . « 86
10.ll' Results . . . . & - * > . - * - a * * s L] - & a . - + . 92
REFERENCES . . & & ¢ ¢t s o v 4« o o 4« s o o & s o s o o « « + 9p
SUMMARIES
REMOVAL OF PROTACTINIUM FROM A SINGLE-FLUID MSBR
System performance for the proposed flowsheet for isolating prot-
actinium from a single-fluid MSBR has been recalculated using current
data for reduction potentials and the solubility of thorium in bismath.
The results indicate that protactinium can be isolated satisfactorily
from reactors fueled with uranium or plutonium.
EFFECT OF CHEMICAL PROCESSING ON THE
NUCLEAR PERFORMANCE CF AN MSBR
A series of calculations hag been performed to investigate the
effects of individual fission product elements on the neutron poilsoning
of a molten-salt breeder reactor. The most important elements are Nd,
Sm, and Pm.
REDUCTIVE EXTRACTION EXPERIMENTS IN A MILD-STEEL
FLOW-THROUGH FACILITY
A bvismuth solution containing about 10m4 mole fraction thorium was
fed through the reductive extraction facility in order to complete the
removal of oxides from surfaces of the system. Analyses of samples of
bismuth taken from various vessels showed only small changes in the
thorium concentration. This indicates that the earlier hydrogen treat-
ment of the system had been quite effective in removing oxides.
Three experiments were performed in which bismuth and molten salt
(72-16~12 mole 7% LiF—BerwThFa) were fed to the packed extraction column.
In the first two runs,; the pressure drop across the column and associated
transfer lines was greater than expected due to iron deposits in the
bismuth exit line from the column. After the tubing had been replaced, a
third run was made at salt and bismuth flow rates of about 75 ml/min.
The flow rates were not steady, apparently due to bismuth that was
trapped in the salt overflow loop at the top of the column. The loop
was modified to correct this condition.
DIGITAL SIMULATION OF THE FLOW CONTROL SYSTEMS
FOR THE REDUCTIVE EXTRACTION FACTLITY
A digital simulation of the bismuth and salt flow control systems
for the reductive extraction facility was carried out to determine con~
troller constants that would result in satisfactory operation. We found
that: (1) the system is stable, (2) proportional control is acceptable,
and (3) the system can be brought to a steady-state condition in an
acceptably short time.
ELECTROLYTIC CELL DEVELOPMENT
The proposed reductive extraction processes for isolating prot-
actinium and removing rare earths are based on the use of electrolytic
cells for reducing lithium and thorium fluorides into a bismuth cathode.
These cells will require an electrically insulating material that can
withstand the corrosive conditions present at the cell anode. Frozen
layers of salt are being considered for this application; experiments
have shown that such salt layers can be maintained in a region of high
heat generation if sufficient cooling is provided. Beryllium oxide may
also be useful in cell construction since it is a good electrical in-
sulator, has a high thermal conductivity, and is relatively insoluble
in molten fluoride salts of interest., We are presently assembling the
equipment for an experiment in which an anode fabricated from Be0O will
be used. The portion of the BeO expected to contact molien salt will
normally be covered by a layer of frozen salt.
ANALYSTS OF MASS TRANSFER IN ELECTROLYTIC CELLS
A study of factors affecting mass transfer in electrolytic cells
has been initiated to identify important cell parameters and to aid in
understanding and interpreting experimental data.
A general mathematical model describing important changes in po-
tential and concentrations throughout a cell was developed. This model was
applied to the cathode region of an electrolytic cell containing an LiF-
BerwThF4 mixture of the composition expected in the electrolytic cell
for the rare-earth removal system. Calculated results (which are only
approximate) indicate that the maximum current density obtainable may
is
be about 0.16 amp/cmz; at this current density, reduction of BeF2
likely to begin.
AXTAL MIXING IN PACKED COLUMNS WITH HIGH-DENSITY FLUIDS
Axial diffusion may be important in determining the performance of
packed-column contactors in flowsheets proposed for MSBR processing.
Since relatively few data on axial dispersion are available, we have
initiated a study of axial dispersion in packed columns using mercury
and water to simulate bismuth and salt. Preliminary data using a steady-
state technique indicated that the dispersion coefficient in a 2~in.-diam
column packed with 3/8-in. Raschig rings is about 3.6 cmz/sec. No sig-
nificant dependence of the dispersion coefficient on mercury or water
flow rate has been observed thus far.
REMOVAL OF HEAT FROM PACKED~COLUMN CONTACTORS USED
FOR IS50LATING PROTACTINIUM
Egtimates have been made of heat transfer and temperature distribution
within packed columns used for isolating protactinium under various oper-
ating conditions. Tt was concluded that the maximum temperature difference
between the center line of the column and the column wall will be less
than 150°C if flow of either the salt or the bismuth can be maintained.
This value is acceptably low. The temperature difference between the
center line of the column and the wall is expected to be substantially
lower than 150°C during periods of normal operation.
MSRE DISTILLATION EXPERIMENT
The experiment to demonstrate high-temperature, low-pressure dis-
tillation of irradiated MSRE fuel carrier salt was successfully completed
in an uneventful 31-hr operation. Approximately 12 liters of salt was
distilled, and 11 condensate samples were collected.
Preliminary results indicate that the behavior of the major com-
ponents (LiF, Ber, and ZrFA) was as expected. The relative volatility
£ 144
0 CeF, was higher by about two orders of magnitude than the expected
3
value. An explanation of this discrepancy is not available; however, as
other data become available, it may be resolved.
1. INTRODUCTION
A molten-salt breeder reactor (MSBR) will be fueled with a molten
fluoride mixture that will circulate through the blanket and core regions
of the reactor and through the primary heat exchanger. We are developing
processing methods for use in a close-coupled facility for removing fis-
sion products, corrosion products, and fissile materials from the molten
fluoride mixture,
Several operations associated with MSBR processing are under study.
The remaining parts of this section describe (1) calculated results
showing the steady-state performance of a protactinium isolation system
for reactors fueled with uranium or plutonium; (2) material-balance cal~
culations showing the effect of fission product removal times on reactor
performance for important fission products:; (3) experiments on reductive
extraction in a mild-steel flow-through facility; (4) a simulation of the
flow control system for the semicontinuous refiuctive extraction system;
(5) experiments related to the development of electrolytic cells for use
with molten salt and bismuth;‘(fi) an analysis of factors limiting the
rate of transfer of materials in electrolytic cells; (7) measurement of
axial dispersion in packed columns in which immiscible fluids having
large density differences are in. countercurrent flow; (8) calculated heat
generation rates and temperatures in an extraction column in which prot-
actinium is being extracted from molten salt; and (9) operation of equip~
ment at the Molten Salt Reactor Experiment (MSRE) for demonstration of
low-pressure distillation of molten salt using irradiated MSRE fuel
carrier salt. This work was carried out in the Chemical Technology
Division during the period April through June 1969.
2. REMOVAL OF PROTACTINIUM FROM A SINGLE-FLUID MSBR
L. E. McNeese M. E. Whatley
System performance for the proposed flowsheet for isolating prot-
actinium from a single-fluid MSBR (Fig. 1) has been recalculated using
current data for reduction potentials and the solubility of thorium in
bismuth. Calculations were made for an MSBR fueled with uranium, as
well as for the initial operation of an MSBR fueled with plutonium.
According to the flowsheet, fuel salt from the reactor enters the
bottom of the extraction column and flows countercurrent to a stream of
bismuth containing reduced metals. Ideally, the metal stream entering
the top of the column contains sufficient Th and Li to extract only the
U and Pu entering the system. The system exploits the fact that Pa is
less noble than U and Pu but more noble than Th. Both U and Pu are
preferentially extracted in the lower part of the column, while Pa
refluxes in the center. High protactinium concentrations are produced
in the salt and metal streams. Most of the protactinium in the system
can be isolated by diverting the salt stream through a tank of sufficient
size (i.e., with a volume of about 200 ft3).
In making the calculations, the following values were assumed: fuel
salt composition, 71.7~16-12-0.3 mole 7% LiFmBeFZ—ThF4"UF4;
1461 ft3; processing rate, 2.5 gpm (three-day cycle); operating tem-
reactor volume,
perature, 600°C; reactor power, 1000 Mw(electrical); and Pa decay tank
volume, 200 ft3. The extraction cdlumn consisted of three theoretical
stages above the decay tank and four stages below the decay tank. The
Th and Li concentrations in the Bi stream being fed to the column were
1.6 x lOm3 and 1.4 x 10_4 mole fraction respectively. In the calcula-
rions for an MSBR fueled with plutonium, the salt composition was assumed
to be 71.8~16-~12~0.2 mole 7% LiF-ReF —ThF4~PuF s
2 33 other values were the
same as those given above.
ORNL DWG 68-9438
UF, IN SALT
ELECTROLYTIC
OXIDIZER -
REDUCER
COLUMN
SINGLE
FLUID
REACTOR
COLUMN
UF, AND PaF, IN SALT U IN Bi
Fig. 1. Scheme for Isclating Protactinium in a Single-Fluid MSBR.
2.1 Steady-State Performance for the Case of an MSBR
Fueled with Uranium
Typical calculated concentration profiles in the extraction column
are shown in Fig. 2. The uranium concentration in the salt increases
from the inlet value of 0.003 mole fraction to approximately 0.004 mole
fraction in the first stage because of the reduction of U(1V) to U(I1II),
It then decreascs steadily to negligible values at the salt outlet. The
concentration of protactinium in the salt increases from the inlet value
of 1.39 x 10"5 mole fraction to a maximum of 0.0021 mole fraction, then
decreases to negligible values near the salt outlet. The cencentration
of Th in the Bi stream decreases from about 0.00132 wmeole fraction in the
upper part of the column to 7.9 x 10~8 mole fraction near thce 3i outlet.
The concentration of Li in the Bi decreases from about 0.00124 mole frac-
tion in the upper part of the column to about 0.00011 mole fraction at the
bottom of the column.
The concentration of uranium and protactinium in the salt entering
the decay tank are 1.25 x 10"5 and 1.325 x 10—3 mole fraction rcspectively.
The concentrations of uranium and protactinium in the decay tank are
2.63 x lf)m5 and 1.312 x 10_3 mole fraction respectively. Under ideal
steady~state operating conditions, approximately 93% of the protactinium
present in the reactor system would be held in the decay tank. !However,
it is likely that the actual amount of protactinium isolated from the
reactor will be somewhat below this value because of an inabilitv to
maintain optimum operating conditions.
The variation of the calculated steady-state protactinium concen-
tration in the reactor and in the decay tank with bismuth flow rate is
shown in Fig. 3. The minimum protactinium concentration in the reactor
is obtained when the bismuth flow rate is just sufficient to extract
the uranium entering the system. At slightly higher bismuth flow rates,
protactinium will also be extracted since it is the next componeat in
order of decreasing nobility. At bismuth flow rates slightly lower than
the optimum rate (about 5.3 gpm), some of the uranium will not bhe ex-
tracted; instead, it will displace protactinium from the decay tank,
ORNL-DWG 69-7640
0
oLiF 10
Q'BQFZ
OThF4 10-—1
] 10“2
U IN SALT
.,...---—-—-T . Li AND Th
.-—-———-—*"Lw IN METAL
U IN: aonmeggel rovrrssmmremen(, 10-3
1074
| =
S
5
10-5 L
Q)
5
&
I 10~®
=
O
b Th IN 1077
i ]7 ME TAL
i....
=
S
= -8
Z 10
()
x Pa DECAY TANK
E | INLET CONC EXIT CONC 10~9
= Pa =1.325 x 1072 1.312 x 1073
* U =1.249 x 1075 2.628 x 1073
| | | | 10—40
1 2 3 4 3 6 7
STAGE NUMBER
Fig. 2. Calculated Concentration Profiles in Protactinium Isola-
tion Column for Reactor Fueled with Uranium.
Pa CONCENTRATION x 10% (mole fraction)
1400
1200 |
10C0
800
600
4C0
200
ORNL-DWG 69-7641
T | T
| ; i CONDITIONS
5 E | REACTOR VOLUME: 1461 ft°
DECAY TANK VOLUME: 200 >
| SALT FLOW RATE: 2.5 gpm
i | |
. [ | L TOWER ABOVE TANK: 3 smeefl
| | TOWER BELOW TANK: 4 STAGES
; } +
| |
|
| | ]
| | -\ DECAY TANK
| | | |
REACTOR AND 5 \
_ DECAY TANK l REAC?R
. \ |
5.0 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 5.6 5.7 5.8 5.9
8ISMUTH FLOW RATE (gpm)
Fig. 3. Variation of Calcuiated Steady-State Protactinium Concen-
ration in the Reactor and in the Decay Tank with Bismuth Flow Rate for
an MSBR Fueled with Uranium,
6.0
01
11
forcing the latter to flow out the top of the column if the flow rate
is not corrected. In either case, some protactinium would be allowed
to return to the reactor, and the effectiveness of the system would be
diminished.
The flowsheet has several very desirable characteristics, including
(1) a negligible holdup of fissile 233U in the isolation system, (2) an
almost immediate return of newly produced 233U to the reactor system,
and (3) a closed system that precludes loss of protactinium, 233U, or
other components of the fuel salt. Since the performance of the system
is sensitive to variations In operating conditions, attention has been
given to methods for controlling the system and for making the performance
less dependent on operating conditions. The removal of uranium from the
center of the columfi makes the system less sensitive to minor changes in
operating conditions (see Fig. 4). For example, removal of 2% of the
uranium in the salt entering the decay tank by fluorination results in
complete stabilization of the system with respect to bismuth flow rate
variations (below the optimum flow rate) as large as 1.03% of the optimum.
The uranium concentration in the salt, which is very sensitive to small’
changes in operating conditions near optimum conditions, increases by a
factor of 5000 for a decrease in bismuth flow rate of only 0.037%.
2.2 Steady~State Performance for the Case of an MSBR
Fueled with Plutonium
An MSBR may be fueled initially with plutonium, which would remain
233 233
Pa and U
inventories to build up. Since the value for the Pu-Pa separation
in the reactor system during the time required for the
factor is only about one-half that for the U-Pa separation factor, we
would expect the isoclation of Pa from a Pu-fueled system to be more
difficult than from a U~fueled system. Typical calculated concentration
profiles in the extraction column for a Pu-fueled system are shown in
Fig. 5. It was assumed that the Pa inventory in the salt was the steady-
X
Pa CONCENTRATION IN REACTOR
(mole fraction)
200
175
150
125
100
-~
w
o
O
N
w
o
ORNL-0OWG 69-7837
Pa IN REACTOR
2 % U REMOVAL
NO U REMOVALX
X A
: R
N T
Pa IN REACTOR!
U IN SALT
WITH NO U REMOVAL
' ENTERING DECAY TANK ~—
|
\
]
i
I
i
-~
\
E
‘ | /
VN ; ?
] \
5.0
Fig., 4.
5.15
5.20 5.25
5.3C
5.35 5.40 5.45
BISMUTH FLOW RATE (gpm)
Effects of the Uranium Removal and the Bismuth Flow Rate
on the Protactinium Concentration in the Reactor and on the Uranium Con-
centration in the Salt Entering the Decay Tank.
10°
107"
U IN SALT ENTERING DECAY TANK / MAX
U CONCENTRATION
¢l
13
ORNL-DWG 69-7638
0
oLiF 10
oBef. 2
R e — e 10~
e 4072
——
0{/’,/’/b/r <
S
- S
| £
T o
Q
£
=
Q
}._,
et
'
b
<
O
—8
Z T Pa DECAY TANK 10
© INLET CONC EXIT CONC
S Pu=2.22 x107% 2.22 x1074 .
o - _ -3 ~3 — 10
Q Pa = 1.244 x 10 1.231 x 10 ;
L U =0 1.3 xA0
J J I J J 10"10
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
STAGE NUMBER
Fig. 5. Calculated Concentration Profiles in the Protactinium Tso-
lation Column for a Reactor Fueled with Plutonium.
14
state value and that a negligible quantity of U was present; although
this condition will not actually exist, the results for such a case
should indicate the relative ease or difficulty to be encountered in
isolating Pa from a system fueled with Pu. The plutonium concentration
in the salt decreases steadily from the inlet value of 0.0002 mole
fraction to negligible values at the salt outlet. The councentration of
protactinium in the salt increases from the inlet value of 2.5 x 10—5
mole fraction to a maximum of 1.244 x 10“3 mole fraction, then decreases
to negligible values. The concentration of Th in the Bi stream decreases
from 1.26 x 10“3 mole fraction in the upper part of the column to
5.6 x lO_6 mole fraction at the Bi outlet. The concentration of lithium
in the bismuth decreases from about 1.23 x 10*3 mole fraction in the
upper part of the column to about 3.2 x 10“4 mole fraction at the column
exit.
The concentrations of plutonium and protactinium in the salt entering
the decay tank are 2.22 x 10'"!‘r and 1.244 x 10“3 mole fraction respectively.
The concentration of protactinium in the decay tank is 1.231 x lOM3 mole
fraction. Under ideal steady—-state operating conditions, approximately
87% of the protactinium present in the reactor system would be held in
the decay tank.
The variation of the protactinium concentration in the reactor and in
the decay tank with bismuth flow rate is shown in Fig. 6. The results
indicate that the isclation of protactinium in a reactor fueled with
plutonium would be feasible.
3. EFFECT OF CHEMICAL PROCESSING ON THE NUCLEAR
PERFORMANCE OF AN MSBR
M. J. Bell L. E. McNeese
A series of calculations has been performed to investigate the im-
portance of individual fission product elements on the neutron poisoning
Pa CONCENTRATION x 10° (mole fraction)