-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 38
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[REVIEW]: gibbonNetR: an R Package for the Use of Convolutional Neural Networks and TransferLearning on Acoustic Data #7250
Comments
Hello humans, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks. For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
|
Software report:
Commit count by author:
|
Paper file info: 📄 Wordcount for ✅ The paper includes a |
License info: 🟡 License found: |
|
👋 @Desjonqu @steffilazerte thanks again for agreeing to review this submission. Let me know if you need any help starting the review process here. One additional thing I would like to ask you is to not use this issue thread for discussions but instead open github issues on https://github.com/DenaJGibbon/gibbonNetR and link back to this thread here for easier reference. Please complete your review in the next 4-5 weeks 🙏 |
@Desjonqu @steffilazerte can you please give us an update about the status of your review? Let me know if you need help or have further questions. |
Hi @faroit, Hi @DenaJGibbon, I have no update to report other than that this review is on my to-do list and will be done within the requested time frame. Thanks! |
Hi @faroit, same here. I'll be probably working on this on November 6-7th, I'll try earlier but not sure it will happen. |
Submitting author: @DenaJGibbon (Dena Clink)
Repository: https://github.com/DenaJGibbon/gibbonNetR
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch):
Version: 1.0.0
Editor: @faroit
Reviewers: @Desjonqu, @steffilazerte
Archive: Pending
Status
Status badge code:
Reviewers and authors:
Please avoid lengthy details of difficulties in the review thread. Instead, please create a new issue in the target repository and link to those issues (especially acceptance-blockers) by leaving comments in the review thread below. (For completists: if the target issue tracker is also on GitHub, linking the review thread in the issue or vice versa will create corresponding breadcrumb trails in the link target.)
Reviewer instructions & questions
@Desjonqu & @steffilazerte, your review will be checklist based. Each of you will have a separate checklist that you should update when carrying out your review.
First of all you need to run this command in a separate comment to create the checklist:
The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. Any questions/concerns please let @faroit know.
✨ Please start on your review when you are able, and be sure to complete your review in the next six weeks, at the very latest ✨
Checklists
@Desjonqu, please create your checklist typing:
@editorialbot generate my checklist
@steffilazerte, please create your checklist typing:
@editorialbot generate my checklist
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: