[PRE REVIEW]: Contextualized: Heterogeneous Modeling Toolbox

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: @cnellington (Caleb Ellington)
Repository: https://github.com/cnellington/Contextualized
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): joss
Version: v0.2.7
Editor: @fabian-s
Reviewers: @holl-, @pescap
Managing EiC: Arfon Smith

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/eff44b075cc108df6151e5123975115f"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/eff44b075cc108df6151e5123975115f/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/eff44b075cc108df6151e5123975115f/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/eff44b075cc108df6151e5123975115f)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @cnellington. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@cnellington if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.19 s (432.2 files/s, 168491.8 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                          44            903           1525           3951
Jupyter Notebook                16              0          22839           1264
CSS                              1             23             17            510
HTML                             1              7            110            348
Markdown                         7             60              0            196
TeX                              2             12              0            172
YAML                             5             18             33            121
JavaScript                       1              9              2            109
TOML                             1              4              0             43
reStructuredText                 2             16             52              8
Bourne Shell                     2              0              0              4
SVG                              1              0              0              1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            83           1052          24578           6727
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

[editorialbot]

Wordcount for paper.md is 862

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.48550/arXiv.2310.07918 is OK
- 10.48550/arXiv.2310.11340 is OK
- 10.1101/2023.12.01.569658 is OK
- 10.1016/j.jbi.2022.104086 is OK
- 10.1609/aaai.v34i03.5693 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- 10.1101/2020.06.25.20140053 may be a valid DOI for title: Discriminative Subtyping of Lung Cancers from Histopathology Images via Contextual Deep Learning

INVALID DOIs

- None

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[editorialbot]

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

ConTEXT Explorer: a web-based text analysis tool for exploring and visualizing concepts across time
Submitting author: @alicia-ziying-yang
Handling editor: @faroit (Active)
Reviewers: @sara-02, @baileythegreen
Similarity score: 0.8001

High-performance neural population dynamics modeling enabled by scalable computational infrastructure
Submitting author: @a9p
Handling editor: @emdupre (Active)
Reviewers: @richford, @tachukao
Similarity score: 0.7996

modelStudio: Interactive Studio with Explanations for ML Predictive Models
Submitting author: @hbaniecki
Handling editor: @terrytangyuan (Retired)
Reviewers: @acolum, @expectopatronum
Similarity score: 0.7981

Lumen: A software for the interactive visualization of probabilistic models together with data
Submitting author: @nandaloo
Handling editor: @vissarion (Active)
Reviewers: @crhea93, @szkafander
Similarity score: 0.7948

Synthia: multidimensional synthetic data generation in Python
Submitting author: @dmey
Handling editor: @oliviaguest (Active)
Reviewers: @khinsen, @mnarayan
Similarity score: 0.7944

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

[arfon]

@cnellington - thanks for your submission to JOSS. We're currently managing a large backlog of submissions and the editor most appropriate for your area is already rather busy.

For now, we will need to waitlist this paper and process it as the queue reduces. Thanks for your patience!

[arfon]

@editorialbot invite @fabian-s as editor

👋 @fabian-s – would you be willing to edit this submission for JOSS?

[editorialbot]

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

[fabian-s]

Sure!

[fabian-s]

@editorialbot assign @fabian-s as editor

[editorialbot]

Assigned! @fabian-s is now the editor

[fabian-s]

hi @cansavvy,
would you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

[fabian-s]

hi @pescap,
would you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

[fabian-s]

hi @holl-,
would you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

[holl-]

@fabian-s Sure, I can serve as reviewer for this project. Note that I'll be unavailable between Mar 20 to 28.

[fabian-s]

Thanks you @holl- !
That is not a problem.

[fabian-s]

@editorialbot add @holl- as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@holl- added to the reviewers list!

[pescap]

hi @pescap, would you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

Sure!

[fabian-s]

ty @pescap

[fabian-s]

@editorialbot add @pescap as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@pescap added to the reviewers list!

[fabian-s]

@editorialbot start review

[editorialbot]

OK, I've started the review over in #6469.