[PRE REVIEW]: chemotools: A Python Package that Integrates Chemometrics and scikit-learn

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: @paucablop (Pau Cabaneros López)
Repository: https://github.com/paucablop/chemotools
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch):
Version: v0.1.3
Editor: @bmcfee
Reviewers: @vinayak2019, @Kastakin
Managing EiC: Kevin M. Moerman

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/1ea3dd0ed0e9f8e3de070d884dc45ddb"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/1ea3dd0ed0e9f8e3de070d884dc45ddb/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/1ea3dd0ed0e9f8e3de070d884dc45ddb/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/1ea3dd0ed0e9f8e3de070d884dc45ddb)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @paucablop. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@paucablop if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.44 s (321.4 files/s, 27480.1 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SVG                              6              0             15           3882
Markdown                        43            973              0           1861
Python                          44           1084           1832           1703
HTML                            39              0              0            539
YAML                             8             30             39            190
TeX                              1              7              0             59
JSON                             1              0              0              8
TOML                             1              0              0              6
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                           143           2094           1886           8248
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

[editorialbot]

Wordcount for paper.md is 1209

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- None

MISSING DOIs

- 10.1039/c4an01061b may be a valid DOI for title: Baseline correction using asymmetrically reweighted penalized least squares smoothing

INVALID DOIs

- https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.27586 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2009.07.007 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2020.116045 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[editorialbot]

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

ChemPy: A package useful for chemistry written in Python
Submitting author: @bjodah
Handling editor: @kyleniemeyer (Active)
Reviewers: @bryanwweber
Similarity score: 0.8299

PiSCAT: A Python Package for Interferometric Scattering Microscopy
Submitting author: @po60nani
Handling editor: @emdupre (Active)
Reviewers: @ziatdinovmax, @aquilesC
Similarity score: 0.8233

Kinetics Toolkit: An Open-Source Python Package to Facilitate Research in Biomechanics
Submitting author: @felixchenier
Handling editor: @meg-simula (Retired)
Reviewers: @alcantarar, @melund
Similarity score: 0.8220

MSMetaEnhancer: A Python package for mass spectra metadata annotation
Submitting author: @hechth
Handling editor: @csoneson (Active)
Reviewers: @marshallmcdonnell, @chryswoods
Similarity score: 0.8202

Museo ToolBox: A Python library for remote sensing including a new way to handle rasters.
Submitting author: @nkarasiak
Handling editor: @kbarnhart (Retired)
Reviewers: @cmillion, @mollenburger
Similarity score: 0.8174

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

[paucablop]

Hi! Thanks for the fast answer 😄 I have checked the reviewers list, and I think the following reviewers can be suitable for the submission (not necessarily in this order).

• untzag
• larsenkg
• ksunden

Submitting author: @paucablop (Pau Cabaneros López) Repository: https://github.com/paucablop/chemotools Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: v0.1.3 Editor: Pending Reviewers: Pending Managing EiC: Kevin M. Moerman

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/1ea3dd0ed0e9f8e3de070d884dc45ddb"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/1ea3dd0ed0e9f8e3de070d884dc45ddb/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/1ea3dd0ed0e9f8e3de070d884dc45ddb/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/1ea3dd0ed0e9f8e3de070d884dc45ddb)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @paucablop. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@paucablop if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman]

@editorialbot invite @bmcfee as editor

[editorialbot]

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

[bmcfee]

@editorialbot add @bmcfee as editor

[editorialbot]

Assigned! @bmcfee is now the editor

[bmcfee]

👋 I'll get on the search for reviewers!

[Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman]

@bmcfee any luck finding/contacting reviewers?

[bmcfee]

@Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman no nibbles in the first couple of volleys, but I'm still at it.

[bmcfee]

Just updating that the last few rounds did not produce any nibbles either. Launching another one today. 🤞

[paucablop]

Awesome! Thanks for the work! 💪

[Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman]

@bmcfee how are you getting on finding reviewers? Let us know if you need help, or if we should ask the other editorial board members for help too.

[bmcfee]

@Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman Still at it - did not get any hits with the usual strategies (past reviewers of similar projects) and have begun asking authors of similar projects, while avoiding those currently in review. No positive results as of yet.

Since this isn't quite my area, suggestions from the board would be most welcome!

[bmcfee]

@editorialbot add @vinayak2019 as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@vinayak2019 added to the reviewers list!

[bmcfee]

Just updating that reviewer search is still ongoing here - no bites in the last few volleys.

[bmcfee]

@editorialbot add @Kastakin as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@Kastakin added to the reviewers list!

[bmcfee]

@editorialbot start review

[editorialbot]

OK, I've started the review over in #6802.