[PRE REVIEW]: WPSS, a web panel sample service

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: @tvi-cdsp (Tom Villette)
Repository: https://github.com/CDSP-SCPO/WPSS-for-ESS-webpanel
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): joss
Version: 2023-06-21
Editor: @ajstewartlang
Reviewers: @joaojcorreia, @pmkruyen
Managing EiC: Olivia Guest

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/5768aec952b754f50f444760106706af"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/5768aec952b754f50f444760106706af/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/5768aec952b754f50f444760106706af/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/5768aec952b754f50f444760106706af)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @tvi-cdsp. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@tvi-cdsp if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.17 s (1978.7 files/s, 178450.7 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                         110           2298            979           8401
PO File                         12           2117           2652           5211
HTML                           123             97              1           3933
Markdown                        40            767              0           1455
YAML                            28             37              9            991
JSON                             2              0              0            450
Sass                            10             26             35            138
Dockerfile                       1             14             13             25
Bourne Shell                     2              0              1             20
SVG                              1              0              0              1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                           329           5356           3690          20625
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

[editorialbot]

Wordcount for paper.md is 886

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[oliviaguest]

@britta-wstnr @samhforbes @ajstewartlang @chartgerink any of you have the capacity right now or in the near future? 😊

[chartgerink]

I'm only able to edit 1 paper at the moment - thanks for asking tho!

[samhforbes]

Currently well over my quota, so not available right at the minute I'm afraid!

[britta-wstnr]

I also am above my quota right now, sorry!

[ajstewartlang]

👋 @oliviaguest I can take this on as I'm just finishing up with a submission...

[ajstewartlang]

@editorialbot assign me as editor

[editorialbot]

Assigned! @ajstewartlang is now the editor

[ajstewartlang]

👋 @rdrr1990 might you have the bandwidth to review this submission please?

[ajstewartlang]

@editorialbot add @joaojcorreia as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@joaojcorreia added to the reviewers list!

[arfon]

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[editorialbot]

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

DearScholar: A mobile application to conduct qualitative and quantitative diary research
Submitting author: @pmkruyen
Handling editor: @cMadan (Active)
Reviewers: @gcdeshpande, @kinow
Similarity score: 0.8042

psychTestR: An R package for designing and conducting behavioural psychological experiments
Submitting author: @pmcharrison
Handling editor: @oliviaguest (Active)
Reviewers: @Cognitive-Modeller, @DivyaSeernani
Similarity score: 0.7904

The psycho Package: an Efficient and Publishing-Oriented Workflow for Psychological Science
Submitting author: @DominiqueMakowski
Handling editor: @leeper (Retired)
Reviewers: @SachaEpskamp
Similarity score: 0.7900

ur-scape: harnessing data for stakeholder participation in city-making processes
Submitting author: @luyuhao0326
Handling editor: @hugoledoux (Active)
Reviewers: @winstonyym, @cforgaci
Similarity score: 0.7890

SkyPortal: An Astronomical Data Platform
Submitting author: @stefanv
Handling editor: @arfon (Active)
Reviewers: @gnarayan
Similarity score: 0.7889

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

[arfon]

👋 @ajstewartlang – ☝️ this list of the past most similar papers published in JOSS might be a good source of possible reviewers. Please ask past authors first before approaching past reviewers.

[ajstewartlang]

👋 @pmkruyen might you have the bandwidth to review this submission please?

[pmkruyen]

👋 Thank you for reaching out, the software seems very promising to me. I'm however unsure if I have time the next few weeks to review the paper & software. Could you please try to find other reviewers first and else come back to me in about two weeks?

Meanwhile, we use Qualtrics at our university. How can I install / integrate this in Qualtrics? For me the instructions on Github were not that clear. Should I consider this as a plugin that I can upload in Qualtrics?

[ajstewartlang]

Thanks @pmkruyen, I'll do that.

👋 @tvi-cdsp would you be able to answer @pmkruyen's query about integrating your software with Qualtrics?

[tvi-cdsp]

Hello, this is not a plugin to upload in Qualtrics but a webserver communicating with Qualtrics through it's API.

Some configurations have to be done in Qualtrics to allow the webserver to make full use of Qualtrics api through (like creating a dedicated account & a 'technical' survey / library / directory...)

[ajstewartlang]

@pmkruyen I'm still struggling to find reviewers for this submission - might you be ok now to review over the next few weeks or so?

[ajstewartlang]

👋 Thank you for reaching out, the software seems very promising to me. I'm however unsure if I have time the next few weeks to review the paper & software. Could you please try to find other reviewers first and else come back to me in about two weeks?

Meanwhile, we use Qualtrics at our university. How can I install / integrate this in Qualtrics? For me the instructions on Github were not that clear. Should I consider this as a plugin that I can upload in Qualtrics?

👋 @pmkruyen can you let me know whether you might be able to review this within the next month or so? I would really appreciate it as I've not had any success finding an alternative reviewer. If you can confirm, I'll open the GitHub review issue. Many thanks.

[ajstewartlang]

@editorialbot add @pmkruyen as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@pmkruyen added to the reviewers list!

[ajstewartlang]

@editorialbot start review

[editorialbot]

OK, I've started the review over in #6022.

[pmkruyen]

👋 sorry for being unresponsive.

I have not confirmed, but now you have assigned me as reviewer, I have no other option than to do the review 😉🎉

Will try to do the review in the next few weeks (mind that these are my most busy teaching weeks).