Skip to content

8379344: Compact the Unicode/CLDR version tables#30099

Open
naotoj wants to merge 1 commit intoopenjdk:masterfrom
naotoj:JDK-8379344-Compact-Unicode-CLDR-version-tables
Open

8379344: Compact the Unicode/CLDR version tables#30099
naotoj wants to merge 1 commit intoopenjdk:masterfrom
naotoj:JDK-8379344-Compact-Unicode-CLDR-version-tables

Conversation

@naotoj
Copy link
Member

@naotoj naotoj commented Mar 5, 2026

Minor Javadoc fix to java.lang.Character and java.util.spi.LocaleServiceProvider, which list supported Unicode/CLDR versions. Since the tables grow with each JDK release, older releases should be coalesced.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8379344: Compact the Unicode/CLDR version tables (Enhancement - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/30099/head:pull/30099
$ git checkout pull/30099

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/30099
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/30099/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 30099

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 30099

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/30099.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Mar 5, 2026

👋 Welcome back naoto! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 5, 2026

@naotoj This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8379344: Compact the Unicode/CLDR version tables

Reviewed-by: jlu

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 19 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org i18n i18n-dev@openjdk.org labels Mar 5, 2026
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 5, 2026

@naotoj The following labels will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • core-libs
  • i18n

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing lists. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Mar 5, 2026
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Mar 5, 2026

Webrevs

Copy link
Member

@justin-curtis-lu justin-curtis-lu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The new tables look great. I think the JBS issue should be updated to say that the five-most recent releases are shown, rather than the LTS releases.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Mar 5, 2026
@naotoj
Copy link
Member Author

naotoj commented Mar 6, 2026

I think the JBS issue should be updated to say that the five-most recent releases are shown, rather than the LTS releases.

Thanks. I forgot to update the JBS entry, as picking LTSes does not seem to be appropriate from the Java SE spec standpoint.

@liach
Copy link
Member

liach commented Mar 6, 2026

I recommend you add a HTML comment that the non-collapsable table should show 5 entries. Otherwise the rule for hiding entries is confusing and the list may still explode over time.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org i18n i18n-dev@openjdk.org ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants