Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Talk about host specific/independent instead of mutability #238

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 3, 2015

Conversation

duglin
Copy link
Contributor

@duglin duglin commented Oct 30, 2015

Cover my action item from this week's OCI call.

Also moved State json out of config.go since its not really part of
the config.json file/config.

Signed-off-by: Doug Davis dug@us.ibm.com

Cover my action item from this week's OCI call.

Also moved State json out of config.go since its not really part of
the config.json file/config.

Signed-off-by: Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>
2. `runtime.json` : contains host-specific configuration data.
This REQUIRED file, which MUST be named `runtime.json`, contains settings that are host specific such as mount sources and hooks.
The goal is that the bundle can be moved as a unit to another runtime and run the same application once a host-specific `runtime.json` is defined.
When the bundle is packaged up for distribution, this file MUST NOT be included.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There was concern about this from the Solaris folks. I think allowing, but not requiring, runtime.json in distributed bundles makes sense.

@crosbymichael
Copy link
Member

LGTM

1 similar comment
@vbatts
Copy link
Member

vbatts commented Nov 3, 2015

LGTM

vbatts added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 3, 2015
Talk about host specific/independent instead of mutability
@vbatts vbatts merged commit 2d8c7bc into opencontainers:master Nov 3, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants