-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 228
feat: Allow allOf
between enums, string, or int properties that are subtypes
#423
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
forest-benchling
wants to merge
13
commits into
openapi-generators:main
from
benchling:forest-allof-enum
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
13 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
7459155
Allof enum and string or int
forest-benchling 39ace8c
Combine statements
forest-benchling 49753fa
Another style
forest-benchling 598478b
Support enums
forest-benchling 7ed16e4
Style
forest-benchling 94a1656
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/main' into forest-allof-enum
forest-benchling 7561c01
Fix bug
forest-benchling e90720f
Revert "Fix bug"
forest-benchling 5b95eb4
Fix bug
forest-benchling f50fd2b
Lint
forest-benchling 70d663a
Fix bug
forest-benchling 46997d3
Regen
forest-benchling 8cebdec
Add tests
forest-benchling File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
9 changes: 9 additions & 0 deletions
9
end_to_end_tests/golden-record/my_test_api_client/models/all_of_sub_model_type_enum.py
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ | ||
from enum import IntEnum | ||
|
||
|
||
class AllOfSubModelTypeEnum(IntEnum): | ||
VALUE_0 = 0 | ||
VALUE_1 = 1 | ||
|
||
def __str__(self) -> str: | ||
return str(self.value) |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
8 changes: 8 additions & 0 deletions
8
end_to_end_tests/golden-record/my_test_api_client/models/another_all_of_sub_model_type.py
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ | ||
from enum import Enum | ||
|
||
|
||
class AnotherAllOfSubModelType(str, Enum): | ||
SUBMODEL = "submodel" | ||
|
||
def __str__(self) -> str: | ||
return str(self.value) |
8 changes: 8 additions & 0 deletions
8
...o_end_tests/golden-record/my_test_api_client/models/another_all_of_sub_model_type_enum.py
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ | ||
from enum import IntEnum | ||
|
||
|
||
class AnotherAllOfSubModelTypeEnum(IntEnum): | ||
VALUE_0 = 0 | ||
|
||
def __str__(self) -> str: | ||
return str(self.value) |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Using
any
like this will cause every single case to be evaluated beforeany
is, causing extra work. Here I think the best bet is to refactor into an if/return sequence.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good point. Thanks @dbanty for taking care of this.