Skip to content

Previous response id #509

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 15, 2025
Merged

Previous response id #509

merged 2 commits into from
Apr 15, 2025

Conversation

rm-openai
Copy link
Collaborator

@rm-openai rm-openai commented Apr 14, 2025

Allows passing in the previous_response_id to reduce sending the same data again and again.

Test plan:
Examples. Adding tests in next PR shortly.


pakrym-oai
pakrym-oai previously approved these changes Apr 14, 2025
rm-openai added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 15, 2025
Minor change - naming. So that it doesn't pollute the next PR.

---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
* #509
* __->__ #508
Base automatically changed from rm/pr508 to main April 15, 2025 01:37
@rm-openai rm-openai dismissed pakrym-oai’s stale review April 15, 2025 01:37

The base branch was changed.

@rm-openai rm-openai merged commit 92d6e3e into main Apr 15, 2025
@rm-openai rm-openai deleted the rm/pr509 branch April 15, 2025 02:02
@rm-openai rm-openai linked an issue Apr 15, 2025 that may be closed by this pull request
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Why full history as input is still necessary?
2 participants