Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Align runtime metric and resource namespaces #2112

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 18, 2021

Conversation

djaglowski
Copy link
Member

A 'process.runtime' namespace is currently defined in the resource
semantic conventions. The metric semantic conventions suggest that
runtime metrics use a 'runtime' namespace. Since the runtime metrics
are directly related to the runtime resources, they ought to share a
common namespace.

Related to issue #2061, discussed in this comment.

@djaglowski djaglowski marked this pull request as ready for review November 8, 2021 19:53
@djaglowski djaglowski requested review from a team November 8, 2021 19:53
Copy link
Contributor

@jsuereth jsuereth left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I appreciate the goal of trying to align the semantic conventions!

Would be good to have a x-link to the process runtime specification

A 'process.runtime' namespace is currently defined in the resource
semantic conventions. The metric semantic conventions suggest that
runtime metrics use a 'runtime' namespace. Since the runtime metrics
are directly related to the runtime resources, they ought to share a
common namespace.
@djaglowski
Copy link
Member Author

@jsuereth I've added the link.

Any other feedback @jsuereth, @tigrannajaryan?

@tigrannajaryan
Copy link
Member

@aabmass you are the author of the OTEP that introduced the runtime.* metrics. Please review this PR.

Also, @james-bebbington @andrewhsu @justinfoote @jmacd @MrAlias @lzchen you approved the PR that introduced runtime.*. Please review this PR, it moves the runtime.* to process.runtime.*.

Copy link
Contributor

@jmacd jmacd left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💯

Copy link
Member

@aabmass aabmass left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Makes sense to me 👍

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants