Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Instrumentation documentation for users #594

Open
trask opened this issue Jun 28, 2020 · 7 comments
Open

Instrumentation documentation for users #594

trask opened this issue Jun 28, 2020 · 7 comments
Assignees
Labels
contribution welcome Request makes sense, maintainers probably won't have time, contribution would be welcome documentation Improvements or additions to documentation good first issue Good for newcomers

Comments

@trask
Copy link
Member

trask commented Jun 28, 2020

For each instrumentation, document what it captures, including span names and span attributes.

Also document any configuration options.

One option for doc structure: README.md files inside each instrumentation module, with a central "table of contents" that has links into all of the individual README.md files

@trask trask added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation contribution welcome Request makes sense, maintainers probably won't have time, contribution would be welcome labels Jun 28, 2020
@trask trask added good first issue Good for newcomers and removed priority:p3 labels Aug 8, 2022
@ashutosh887
Copy link

I would like to work on this @trask
Please assign

@trask
Copy link
Member Author

trask commented May 3, 2023

hi @ashutosh887! sure, I'd suggest picking one or two specific instrumentations and send documentation PR(s) for those to start with

@breedx-splk
Copy link
Contributor

This is so massive....does it make sense to keep around? We really really want this as well, but it's a major undertaking at this point, more like a project than a feature/enhancement. Curious if there's a better way of tracking this or burning it down....maybe similar to the groovy->java issue?

@mateuszrzeszutek
Copy link
Member

We kinda have parts of it already -- e.g. this page has a table listing instrumentations and the semconvs they implement. And there also are some READMEs with instrumentation specific configs.
I think first we could discuss if this is enough; or if we want something more detailed (personally I like linking to the semconv, instead of going into individual attributes). And we could also move it over to the main opentelemetry.io page.

@trask
Copy link
Member Author

trask commented Jul 14, 2023

And we could also move it over to the main opentelemetry.io page.

👍 I opened open-telemetry/opentelemetry.io#3040

@domenicosf
Copy link

I would like to work on this @trask

@trask
Copy link
Member Author

trask commented Oct 25, 2024

hi @domenicosf! as @breedx-splk mentions above, this is a pretty massive project, I think you can just pick any part and propose something

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
contribution welcome Request makes sense, maintainers probably won't have time, contribution would be welcome documentation Improvements or additions to documentation good first issue Good for newcomers
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants