Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New component: LaunchDarkly Component Wrapper #7942

Closed
MovieStoreGuy opened this issue Feb 16, 2022 · 2 comments
Closed

New component: LaunchDarkly Component Wrapper #7942

MovieStoreGuy opened this issue Feb 16, 2022 · 2 comments
Labels
Sponsor Needed New component seeking sponsor Stale

Comments

@MovieStoreGuy
Copy link
Contributor

The purpose and use-cases of the new component

To allow for organisations to take advantage of existing feature flag practices in order to experiment with new means of trial out processors, receivers, or exporters that can be use in tandem with their currently existing o11y pipeline.

Example configuration for the component

exporters:
   grafana-cloud/trial:
     # All required configuration for sending to grafana cloud
   launchdarkly/new-vendor-on-trial:
      api_key: ${LAUNCH_DARKLY_API_KEY} # encourage those good practices with secrets
      featureflag: o11t-vendor-trial
      expires-at: 2023-06-01-0900:0 # Some official time RFC that includes timezone, also not tied to this field existing
      component: grafana-cloud/trial

service:
   pipeline:
      receivers: [nop]
      exporters: [launchdarkly/new-vendor-on-trial, existing-vendor/otel]

A few things of note is that the definition of the exporter is not actually consumed within the service pipeline but used as a reference by the launchdarkly component wrapper to correctly configure the component being wrapped. Expiration of feature flags is something that I do to encourage feature flags being cleaned up along with in any other code that would rot but I am not tied to this implementation detail since each org / company has their standards on dealing with feature flags.

Furthermore, while I reference an exporter here, I think it could also be used to help progressive migration services to adopt a new internal standard for varying types of receivers.

Telemetry data types supported

The ambition I have in my head is that it would support all components with all telemetry types as it would just wrap existing component

Sponsor (Optional)

As of yet, no current sponsor beyond myself but I am happy to see if there is interest among the community for this.

@codeboten codeboten added the Sponsor Needed New component seeking sponsor label Feb 16, 2022
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Nov 8, 2022

This issue has been inactive for 60 days. It will be closed in 60 days if there is no activity. To ping code owners by adding a component label, see Adding Labels via Comments, or if you are unsure of which component this issue relates to, please ping @open-telemetry/collector-contrib-triagers. If this issue is still relevant, please ping the code owners or leave a comment explaining why it is still relevant. Otherwise, please close it.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Stale label Nov 8, 2022
@MovieStoreGuy
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yeah, I don't think this is a good idea.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Sponsor Needed New component seeking sponsor Stale
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants