Skip to content

Compiler: less agressive inlining #1220

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jan 13, 2022
Merged

Compiler: less agressive inlining #1220

merged 6 commits into from
Jan 13, 2022

Conversation

hhugo
Copy link
Member

@hhugo hhugo commented Jan 11, 2022

fix #1185

Comment on lines 121 to 123
let inlining_limit =
p ~name:"inlining-limit" ~desc:"set the size limit for inlining" (int 500)

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What unit is this in? Bytes?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The unit is not really meaningful. What this feature compute is "number of instructions + number of branching"

@hhugo hhugo merged commit bb6ad4d into master Jan 13, 2022
@hhugo hhugo deleted the better-inlining branch January 13, 2022 12:18
@smorimoto
Copy link
Member

FYI: @linoscope

@linoscope
Copy link

Nice! I will reintroduce inlining and rerun the benchmark once this change is released. Thanks, @hhugo for working on this!

hhugo added a commit to hhugo/opam-repository that referenced this pull request Jan 24, 2022
…s_of_ocaml-ppx_deriving_json, js_of_ocaml-ppx, js_of_ocaml-lwt and js_of_ocaml-compiler (4.0.0)

CHANGES:

## Features/Changes
* Compiler: add --target-env flag, for JS runtime specific compilation targets (ocsigen/js_of_ocaml#1160).
* Compiler: static evaluation of backend_type (ocsigen/js_of_ocaml#1166)
* Compiler: speedup emitting js files (ocsigen/js_of_ocaml#1174)
* Compiler: simplify (a | 0) >>> 0 into (a >>> 0) (ocsigen/js_of_ocaml#1177)
* Compiler: improve static evaluation of cond (ocsigen/js_of_ocaml#1178)
* Compiler: be more consistent dealing with js vs ocaml strings (ocsigen/js_of_ocaml#984)
* Compiler: Compiler: add BigInt to provided symbols (fix ocsigen/js_of_ocaml#1168) (ocsigen/js_of_ocaml#1191)
* Compiler: use globalThis, drop joo_global_object ocsigen/js_of_ocaml#1193
* Compiler: new -Werror flag to turn wanrings into errors (ocsigen/js_of_ocaml#1222)
* Compiler: make the inlining less agressive, reduce size, improve pref (ocsigen/js_of_ocaml#1220)
* Compiler: rename internal library js_of_ocaml-compiler.runtime to js_of_ocaml-compiler.runtime-files
* Lib: new runtime library to improve compatibility with Brr and gen_js_api
* Lib: add messageEvent to Dom_html (ocsigen/js_of_ocaml#1164)
* Lib: add PerformanceObserver API (ocsigen/js_of_ocaml#1164)
* Lib: add CSSStyleDeclaration.{setProperty, getPropertyValue, getPropertyPriority, removeProperty} (ocsigen/js_of_ocaml#1170)
* Lib: make window.{inner,outer}{Width,Height} non-optional
* Lib: introduce Js_of_ocaml.Js_error module, deprecate Js_of_ocaml.Js.Error exception.
* Lib: add deprecation warning for deprecated code
* PPX: json can now be derived for mutable records (ocsigen/js_of_ocaml#1184)
* Runtime: use crypto.getRandomValues when available (ocsigen/js_of_ocaml#1209)
* Misc: move js_of_ocaml-ocamlbuild out to its own repo
* Misc: add support for OCaml 4.14 (ocsigen/js_of_ocaml#1173)

## Bug fixes
* Compiler: fix sourcemap warning for empty cma (ocsigen/js_of_ocaml#1169)
* Compiler: Strengthen bound checks. (ocsigen/js_of_ocaml#1172)
* Compiler: fix `--wrap-with-fun` under node (ocsigen/js_of_ocaml#653, ocsigen/js_of_ocaml#1171)
* Compiler: fix parsing of annotaions in js stubs (ocsigen/js_of_ocaml#1212, fix ocsigen/js_of_ocaml#1213)
* Ppx: allow apostrophe in lident (fix ocsigen/js_of_ocaml#1183) (ocsigen/js_of_ocaml#1192)
* Runtime: fix float parsing in hexadecimal form
* Runtime: fix implementation of caml_js_instanceof
* Graphics: fix mouse_{x,y} (ocsigen/js_of_ocaml#1206)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Release build performs considerably worse compared to dev build due to inlining
4 participants