-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 359
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
opam upgrade: Do not show the not-up-to-date message with packages tagged with avoid-version #6273
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
…gged with avoid-version
7da8317
to
f810b2a
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I needs a test too.
let avoid_version = | ||
List.exists (function | ||
| Pkgflag_AvoidVersion | Pkgflag_Deprecated -> true | ||
| _ -> false) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We should expand the default case, like that if we add another flag and this part is concerned there is an highlight.
let name = OpamPackage.name pkg in | ||
let pkgs = OpamPackage.packages_of_name t.packages name in | ||
let latest = | ||
OpamPackage.Set.fold (fun pkg latest -> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this variable named pkg
and the one defined 4 lines above are not the "same package" but have the same name, this can be misleading when reading the code.
(OpamPackage.names_of_packages to_check) | ||
OpamPackage.Set.fold (fun pkg acc -> | ||
let name = OpamPackage.name pkg in | ||
let pkgs = OpamPackage.packages_of_name t.packages name in |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't know if it worth working on the set of version instead of package one.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
it simplifies the code greatly. Otherwise we would need to have an intermediate map of set and update it
Fixes #6271