Printing new mode syntax #2245
Draft
Printing new mode syntax #2245
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is based on #2235
This PR switches the printing to the new mode syntax as well.
Currently still a draft, because our way of encoding makes the round trip "parsetree -> .ml -> parsetree" not easy to achieve. In particular:
exp : _ @ modesis parsed asPexp_apply (Pexp_extension "jane.erasable.mode" modes) (Pexp_constraint (exp, Ptyp_any), which is then printed as(exp : _) : _ @ modes, which is re-parsed differently. I can workaround this by some extra check, but I'd like a more principled approach.