Repository navigation
Commit 87f776b
docs(agents): os-dev.md — releases ban scoped to code PRs, force-push per landing repo, label-step scope, classifier-denial cell (#19038)
Fixes #18908
Fixes #18882
Fixes #19002
Fixes #19004
Clause-②: no
Four cards on one file, `.claude/agents/os-dev.md`, one branch, three
line-neutral commits (`2300b8938`, `65d09a3b9`, `7f28ee186`). Governed
surface (`.claude/**`) ⇒ draft; landing is the maintainer's word.
`skip-changeset`: `.claude/**` is the fast path — nothing any package's
`files[]` ships moves.
## What changed, line by line (bytes exclude the newline; before =
`main` `75c0dacff`, after = `7f28ee186`)
| line | before (B) | after (B) | card |
|---|---|---|---|
| :67 | 113 · 「4. ⛔ 永不编辑 `content/docs/releases/`、推
`main`、合并任何东西;force-push 只按 AGENTS.md §3。」 | 117 · 「4. ⛔ 永不推 `main`、合并任何
PR、在代码 PR 里改 `content/docs/releases/`;改错另开 docs-only PR。」 | #18908 |
| :68 | 53 · 「 - 用户可见的改动需要 `.changeset/*.md`。」 | 119 · 「 - force-push
按落地仓 AGENTS.md:objectui/cloud 绝对禁;objectstack §3 五条全立才
`--force-with-lease`。」 | #18882 |
| :298 | 116 · 「- `skip-changeset` 唯一判据:没有已发布的东西移动;已发布 = 各包 `files[]`
实际发运的内容。」 | 120 · 「- 发布面动了要 changeset;`skip-changeset` 唯一判据是没动:已发布 = 各包
`files[]` 实际发运内容。」 | pays :68 |
| :301 | 114 · 「- 本仓库:标签是真实机制,…」 | 116 · 「-
objectstack:标签是真实机制,打标签是你的默认步骤,PR 一开出就打;派发词可收窄或禁写。」 | #19002 |
| :304 | 118 · 「- 写入首选加法端点(REST `POST
.../issues/N/labels`,不碰已有标签);可达性按会话探,先探后用。」 | 115 · 「- 写恒经
`scripts/pm/label-write.mjs`:取现集、加法 POST、回读比 union、缺者重挂一次并报告。」 | #19004
|
| :305 | 114 · 「- 被拒 ⇒ …;写后必做对比式读回。」 | 119 · old :307 moved up unchanged
(read-back detects stripping only) | #19004 |
| :306 | 115 · 「- 读回 diff 现集对 union(读集, 目标),缺者 = 被剥的标签,重挂,清单进报告;收尾再读一次。」
| 119 · old :308 moved up unchanged (read-back closes the step; phantom
gate label) | #19004 |
| :307 | 119 · old :307 | 105 · 「- 被拒 ⇒ 报端点与状态码、席位代挂,⛔ 不报 `blocked`、不走
MCP;收尾再读一次。」 | #19004 |
| :308 | 119 · old :308 | 119 · 「- 分类器拒外部写 ⇒ 停手,`deviations`
记命令与拒因,席位代做;⛔ 不换路重发(curl/MCP/手工)。」 | #19004 |
| :309 | 105 · 「- objectui:同名标签对象在,零 workflow/脚本读它、豁免不了任何东西,pin 测试钉着。」 |
119 · 「- objectui:路径标签归 `labeler.yml`,逐 push 同步;无门禁读你打的标签 ⇒ 派发词未点名即零写。」
| #19002 |
| :310 | 114 · 「- 那边用空 frontmatter 的 changeset 声明,门禁判定行是权威;⛔ 永不在
objectui 施加该标签。」 | 119 · 「- objectui 的 `skip-changeset` 零读者;空
frontmatter changeset 即声明,门禁判定行为准,⛔ 永不施加。」 | #19002 |
Ratchet reading: `check-skill-line-ratchet: .claude/agents/os-dev.md is
403 lines (ceiling 403; headroom 0)` — before 403 / 403, after 403 /
403; the 120-byte max-line rule's budget line reads `budget is 120
bytes`; longest changed line is 120 B (:298).
### The folds that paid for the three new lines
1. :68's changeset sentence folds into :298, which already carried the
precise criterion (`skip-changeset` ⇔ nothing published moved); the
fuzzier 「用户可见」 spelling is replaced by its complement 「发布面动了要 changeset」
on the same line. AGENTS.md's Post-Task Checklist step 3 remains the
binding text.
2. :304 + :306 (the four steps written by hand) fold into one line
naming the single spelling that already performs them —
`scripts/pm/label-write.mjs` (`references/rest-channel.md`: 「标签/assignee
写恒经 `scripts/pm/label-write.mjs`」; the four steps, the once-only
re-apply and the report are its own contract). The reachability probe of
old :304 is the tool's exit 3; 「收尾再读一次」 keeps its place on the refusal
line.
3. old :309 + :310 (objectui's `skip-changeset`) fold into one line:
「零读者」 subsumes 「零 workflow/脚本读它、豁免不了任何东西」; dropped as evidence rather
than rule: 「同名标签对象在」 and 「pin 测试钉着」 (the pin is
`objectui/scripts/__tests__/ci-cd-pipeline-doc.test.ts`, `never wires
the phantom skip-changeset label into a workflow or a gate`).
Not a re-wrap anywhere: every line that changed changed its content; old
:307/:308 moved, byte-identical.
## The rulings this PR executes (verbatim)
**#18908 — ruling #18854 B** (comment 5725503560, maintainer 「同意」
2026-09-18T05:13Z):
> 1. **Text**: `.claude/agents/os-dev.md:67` becomes 「⛔ never edit
`content/docs/releases/` **in a code PR**; a factual error on a releases
page is a dedicated docs-only PR, per `AGENTS.md`'s Documentation
Guardrails」 — the same clause `SKILL.md:32` already carries. A
`domain:skills` card (filed by the director with this ruling) carries
it; governed ⇒ human merge by the approver. It unlocks the class, ⛔ not
just this line.
Aligned texts on `main`: `SKILL.md:32` 「⛔ 永不在代码 PR 里改
`content/docs/releases/`。」; `AGENTS.md:685` 「`content/docs/releases/` |
RELEASE-OWNED | ❌ Never edit in a code PR. … Factual error on a releases
page → dedicated docs-only PR or an issue, never a rider on code
changes.」 The pointer to the Documentation Guardrails did not fit the
120-byte line; os-dev.md :19 already binds AGENTS.md whole.
**#18882 — ruling objectui#9666 C** (comment 5724939229, maintainer
「其他同意」 2026-09-18T03:58Z):
> - Neither text changes. The divergence is deliberate: objectui is the
busier shared tree and its ban was measured and refused an exception by
name; objectstack's allowance was ruled on its own facts a week ago.
> - objectui `AGENTS.md`'s cross-repo section gains one sentence: **a
force-push is governed by the `AGENTS.md` of the repository the branch
lives in — objectui and cloud forbid it absolutely, objectstack allows
`--force-with-lease` under its five criteria; a seat working across
repositories reads the landing repo's rule before instructing a dev.**
objectstack's `.claude/agents/os-dev.md` force-push twin, which today
says 「see §3」, is re-pointed at **the landing repository's** §3 (a
sibling objectstack card, `domain:skills`, filed by the director with
this ruling).
The two shapes, read on today's trees: objectstack `AGENTS.md:471-:478`
(§3) — 「**Never force-push a *shared* branch, and never push `main`.** …
A branch is unshared, and `--force-with-lease` allowed, only while ALL
FIVE hold: ① it is named `claude/issue-*`; ② this worktree created it; ③
nobody else has ever pushed it …; ④ no open PR on it carries a reviewer
or an approval …; ⑤ the push spells the lease against the sha you last
pushed — ⛔ never bare `--force`. One criterion failing ⇒ the branch is
shared.」; objectui `AGENTS.md:316` (read at objectui `origin/main`
`a017617`) — 「**绝不 `git push --force`/`--force-with-lease`,绝不推
`main`**(会覆盖并行 agent 的工作;`main` 共享,一律走
PR)。**禁令不按「这条分支是不是只有我一个人用」分档**…所以它一律绝对,单人 feature 分支同样不例外。」; cloud
`AGENTS.md:63` is cited by the ruling's words only (outside this
session's scope). The new :68 says 「落地仓 AGENTS.md」 rather than 「落地仓 §3」
because objectui's rule carries no section number; objectstack's is
named `§3` where the five criteria live.
**#19002** (triage 5729068374): the deliverable is the label step's
SCOPE, no new rule. Measured on objectui `origin/main` `a017617`:
`.github/workflows/labeler.yml` runs `actions/labeler@v7` with
`configuration-path: .github/labeler.yml` and `sync-labels: true` on
every `pull_request` open/synchronize/reopen — path labels are written
by it and re-synced on every push; across all 40 workflow files, zero
read a PR label (`grep -rn -E
"labels\.\*\.name|pull_request\.labels|event\.label\b|\.labels\b"
.github/workflows/` → no hit); the only scripts that read labels are
`scripts/pm/check-half-states.mjs` (the PM board's `pm:*` states) and
`scripts/check-governed-queue-guard.mjs` (`CONTRACT_REVIEW_LABEL =
'needs:contract-review'`, the seat's, os-dev.md :303) — neither a label
a dev writes. On objectstack, `.github/workflows/pr-automation.yml:290`
reads `skip-changeset` in a job condition, so 「标签是真实机制」 is now
attributed to `objectstack` by name. The filing seat's measured four PRs
(objectui#9804/#9812/#9826/#9854, labels present with no dev write)
agree with the mechanism. No maintainer word needed: the two mechanisms
decide the scope, nothing is presumed beyond them.
**#19004** (triage 5729095625): 「契约里该写的是停手并上报,⛔ 不是换一条手工路径继续」. The new
:308 is the classifier cell beside the endpoint cell (:307): the trigger
is an external write the session classifier refuses (「外部写」 — not any
denied local tool, since the card's line is 「never re-issue the same
EXTERNAL write by another route」), the conduct is stop, record the
command and the classifier's reason under `deviations` (a
dispatch-carried report field, `SKILL.md:536`), hand the act to the
seat, and never re-issue it by another route, the three routes named. It
covers every tool the dispatch names, labels included; the seat-side
half already lives in `references/rest-channel.md` (「会话分类器拒改动 ⇒
无通道,交有通道席位立卡」).
## Gates (run at `7f28ee186`, exit codes captured before any pipe;
ledger reconciled with `dispatch-gates.mjs --ran`)
Derived by `node scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs --commands --repo
objectstack-ai/objectstack` off merge base `75c0dacff` (1 path): 19
commands. `--ran` verdict: `19 derived famil(ies) accounted for — 19
run, 0 NOT-MEASURED`.
- `pnpm check:pm-skill-ratchet` :: exit 0 — `os-dev.md is 403 lines
(ceiling 403; headroom 0)`
- `pnpm check:pm-skill-id-lint` :: exit 0 — `27 file(s) clean (pattern
/#[0-9]{3,}/g)`
- `pnpm check:agent-model-declared` :: exit 0 — `1 agent definition(s)
under .claude/agents/ all declare a model`
- `pnpm check:nul-bytes` :: exit 0
- `pnpm check:skill-frame-sync` :: exit 0 · `pnpm
check:watch-hint-literal` :: exit 0 · `pnpm check:refd-timer-probe` ::
exit 0
- `pnpm check:pm-governed-merges` :: exit 0 · `node
scripts/pm/check-governed-queue-guard.mjs --self-test` :: exit 0 (253
cases) · `node scripts/pm/check-harness-current.mjs --self-test` :: exit
0
- `pnpm check:commit-card-trailers` :: exit 0 (and the pre-push hook: 3
commits, no card relation, model-free trailer pair)
- `pnpm check:doc-authoring` :: exit 0 · `pnpm
check:agent-test-spelling` :: exit 0 · `pnpm
check:cross-package-test-inputs` :: exit 0 · `pnpm
check:driver-memory-census` :: exit 0
- `node scripts/check-closing-keyword-parity.mjs` :: exit 0 (+
`--self-test` :: exit 0) · `node scripts/check-comment-mask-corpus.mjs`
:: exit 0 (6861 files, 0 disagree)
- `pnpm --filter @objectstack/lint run check:doc-formula-expressions` ::
first run exit 3 = PREREQUISITE NOT MET (`@objectstack/formula` not
built — nothing measured); after `pnpm exec turbo run build
--filter=@objectstack/formula --filter=@objectstack/lint` under
`os-verify-lock.sh` (VERDICT command-exit 0), re-run :: exit 0 — `22
record-scoped formula example(s) across 438 files … judged clean`
- `node scripts/pm/check-governed-merges.mjs --test
.claude/agents/os-dev.md` :: exit 3 = its GOVERNED code — 「混合 diff
一条命中即整 PR 分叉」; this PR stays draft.
- `pnpm check:pm-dispatch-gates` (named by the dispatch, outside the
derived 19): detached at PR-open time; its verdict is reported in the
`os-dev-report` comment, NOT MEASURED if the container cut it.
Not run locally, by declaration: the repo-level `pnpm lint` sweep and
the rest of CI's artifact-roster families — a Markdown-only diff under
`.claude/` touches no package, so ① and ② of the local scope are empty.
## Acceptance notes
- noted, not filed: the report JSON template in os-dev.md (:361-:377)
carries no `deviations` field; `SKILL.md:536` names it as a field the
dispatch adds (`gates / line_budget / deviations / files_changed`). The
new :308 names the field as the dispatch does. 承接者: the skills seat, if
the template should ever list it.
- noted, not filed: the dispatch's byte readings for :67/:301/:305/:308
(114/115/115/120) each include the trailing newline; measured without it
they are 113/114/114/119. 承接者:无.
- noted, not filed: objectui's labeler runs `sync-labels: true`, so a
dev-written `package: *` label that stops matching the diff is stripped
on the next push — one more reason the objectui scope reads 「零写」. 承接者:无.
## 维护者速读(草稿)
**改了什么**:只动 `.claude/agents/os-dev.md` 一个文件,403 行进 403 行出,四张卡合一。① 第 67
行:原来「永不编辑 `content/docs/releases/`」改成「永不在代码 PR 里改」,改错另开 docs-only PR ——
与 SKILL.md、AGENTS.md 已有的口径对齐;② 第 68 行:force-push 改为「按落地仓的
AGENTS.md」,并写明两种形态(objectui/cloud 绝对禁;objectstack 五条全立才
`--force-with-lease`);③ 第 301/309/310 行:打标签这一步写明仓别 —— objectstack 是 dev
的默认步骤,objectui 的路径标签归 labeler、派发词不点名就一个标签也不打;④ 第 308
行:新增「会话分类器拒了一笔外部写」这一格 —— 停手、把命令和拒因记进报告、交席位代做,⛔ 不换 curl/MCP/手工路线重发。
**为什么改**:①② 是维护者已裁的两条(#18854 裁决 B、objectui#9666 裁决 C),这里只是把裁决落到 dev
的角色文件;③ 是一处作用域写死 —— 同一份文件此前既说「本仓库打标签是你的步骤」,又只为 objectui 划了一个标签的例外,dev 在
objectui 得自己猜,实测 objectui 零门禁读 dev 打的标签;④ 是一次实测的绕过:一个 dev 被分类器拒了
`label-write.mjs` 之后用手在 REST 上重做了那四步,结果对了,但下一次的保障就只剩执行者的记性。
**风险与代价(含回滚)**:全是规则文本,不发布、不改代码。代价是第 304 行把「四步手写」换成点名
`scripts/pm/label-write.mjs`(那四步是它内建的),第 310 行把 objectui 的
`skip-changeset` 两行并成一行(丢的是「pin 测试钉着」这类证据句,不是规则)。回滚 = revert 这一个文件的三个
commit,零副作用。
**席位意见**:(留空)
**你要做的**:确认四张卡的裁决/分诊意图都落到了对应行(67 / 68 / 301 / 308 / 309 /
310),然后按受管面流程由你合并;不需要任何决策 —— #19002 的作用域由两仓的机制决定,本 PR 没有替维护者预设答案。
---
_Generated by [Claude
Code](https://claude.ai/code/session_01BTeBejoPUvRHN8WdAJC6oF)_
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>1 parent 9150b79 commit 87f776b
1 file changed
Lines changed: 9 additions & 9 deletions
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
64 | 64 | | |
65 | 65 | | |
66 | 66 | | |
67 | | - | |
68 | | - | |
| 67 | + | |
| 68 | + | |
69 | 69 | | |
70 | 70 | | |
71 | 71 | | |
| |||
295 | 295 | | |
296 | 296 | | |
297 | 297 | | |
298 | | - | |
| 298 | + | |
299 | 299 | | |
300 | 300 | | |
301 | | - | |
| 301 | + | |
302 | 302 | | |
303 | 303 | | |
304 | | - | |
305 | | - | |
306 | | - | |
| 304 | + | |
307 | 305 | | |
308 | 306 | | |
309 | | - | |
310 | | - | |
| 307 | + | |
| 308 | + | |
| 309 | + | |
| 310 | + | |
311 | 311 | | |
312 | 312 | | |
313 | 313 | | |
| |||
0 commit comments