fix(cli): make a failed stderr write non-fatal on the published entry

`bin/run.js` writes to `process.stderr` with no `error` listener, so an
`error` event there is an uncaught exception. #15564 was filed NOT
REPRODUCED, and its fence was explicit: symmetry with `bin/run-dev.js` is
not evidence, establish reachability first.

Both of the card's probes were re-run before anything was written here and
both still read clean — exit 2, no `uncaughtException`, 3/3 each. They were
not a guard, they were the wrong lifecycle: everything a failing invocation
puts on stderr is written after `run()` has settled, by `handle()`, which
exits on top of its own report, and a failing write reports through libuv's
completion callback that a synchronous exit is never told about.

Widening to a lifecycle that outlives its first failed write reaches it.
`os serve` on `examples/app-todo`, read end destroyed:

    uncaughtException  code=EPIPE  msg=write EPIPE
          at afterWriteDispatched (node:internal/stream_base_commons:159:15)
    exit  code=1

3 of 3 runs, 3049-3433 ms in — the same frame and status #14858 traced on
the dev shim. The same child read by a draining parent boots, serves, and
exits 0 after 7926 bytes over 16.6 s.

Pinned with the hazard manufactured inside the published binary's own
process, alongside a live positive control that removes the listener in the
child and re-crashes it, so the guarded arm's silence is a reading.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01YFY46JydE1gMxQG1TqBcMZ

Author: claude

.changeset/tidy-cars-repeat.md

@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+---
+'@objectstack/cli': patch
+---
+
+Stop the published CLI from dying of an uncaught `write EPIPE` when its caller's stderr read end is gone.
+
+`bin/run.js` — the file `bin.objectstack` / `bin.os` point at, and the only thing under `bin/` npm packs — now attaches the same no-op `error` listener to `process.stderr` that the in-repo dev shim has carried since the original finding. `process.stderr` is an `EventEmitter`, so an `error` event with nothing listening is an uncaught exception.
+
+Measured on the published entry with the read end destroyed (`stdio: ['ignore','ignore','pipe']`, then `child.stderr.destroy()`), traced with an observer that installs no listener and wraps no write:
+
+```
+uncaughtException  code=EPIPE  msg=write EPIPE
+      at afterWriteDispatched (node:internal/stream_base_commons:159:15)
+exit  code=1
+```
+
+3 of 3 runs, 3049-3433 ms in, on `os serve` over `examples/app-todo`. Read by a draining parent the same child boots and serves and exits 0, having written 7926 bytes over 16.6 s — so the crash was costing the run at its first diagnostic line and 20 of its 21 stderr writes. Failing invocations do not reach it: everything they put on stderr is written after `run()` has settled, by a handler that exits on top of its own report.
+
+Behaviour change worth knowing about: a long-running command (`os serve`, `os dev`, `os start`) whose reader has gone now keeps running and reports its own exit status, instead of dying on its first diagnostic write. A supervisor that destroyed the read end and relied on that crash to end the child needs to end it itself.

packages/cli/bin/run.js

@@ -70,6 +70,77 @@ try {
   // Unbuilt or half-built tree — nothing to install and nothing to say.
 }
 
+/**
+ * Make a FAILED stderr write non-fatal, so a caller whose read end is gone
+ * still gets this CLI's own exit status instead of a crash. #14858, reached on
+ * THIS entry point by the #15564 measurement.
+ *
+ * `process.stderr` is an `EventEmitter`, and an `error` event with nothing
+ * listening IS an uncaught exception. `bin/run-dev.js` has carried this
+ * listener since #14858; the published entry did not, and #15564 was filed
+ * NOT REPRODUCED because the two probes that had been run against it — a
+ * bad command id, and `OBJECTSTACK_DEBUG=1` over an unbuilt `@objectstack/spec`
+ * — both answered exit 2 with no `uncaughtException`. Re-run here, they still
+ * do (3/3 each, 57 and 35528 bytes drained). ⭐ They were not a guard; they
+ * were the wrong lifecycle, and the difference is measurable rather than
+ * arguable:
+ *
+ *     leg (bin/run.js, read end destroyed)      stderr writes   exit
+ *     ---------------------------------------   -------------   ----------------
+ *     `definitely-not-a-command`                1 @ 3231 ms      2, no crash
+ *     OBJECTSTACK_DEBUG=1 + unbuilt spec       60 @ 932-960 ms   2, no crash
+ *     `serve objectstack.config.ts`            21 @ 3180 ms on   1, `write EPIPE`
+ *                                                                  3/3
+ *
+ * Two things separate the last row, and BOTH are needed:
+ *
+ *   • an event-loop TURN between the failing write and `process.exit`. A
+ *     failing write reports through libuv's completion callback, so a write
+ *     followed by a synchronous exit is never told. Both probe legs are that
+ *     shape: everything they put on stderr is written after `run()` has already
+ *     settled, by `handle()`, which exits on top of its own report — measured
+ *     at one write 1 ms before exit, and at 59 warning blocks whose EPIPE
+ *     arrives synchronously inside the write.
+ *   • a RAW `process.stderr.write`. Node's `console.error` carries
+ *     `ignoreErrors`, which parks a temporary `error` listener across the write
+ *     — so oclif's warning blocks cannot crash this process at any size
+ *     (measured: 1 MiB through `console.error` does not, one line through
+ *     `process.stderr.write` does, 3/3 each).
+ *
+ * `os serve` is both: `printDiagnostic` in `src/commands/serve.ts` writes
+ * straight to stderr (#7915) and the boot around it is asynchronous, so the
+ * process is alive across the whole sequence. Measured on `examples/app-todo`
+ * through this file, read end destroyed (`stdio: ['ignore','ignore','pipe']`,
+ * then `child.stderr.destroy()`), traced with a `--import` observer that
+ * installs NO listener here and wraps no write:
+ *
+ *     uncaughtException  code=EPIPE  msg=write EPIPE
+ *           at afterWriteDispatched (node:internal/stream_base_commons:159:15)
+ *     exit  code=1
+ *
+ * 3 of 3 runs, 3049-3433 ms in — the same frame and the same status #14858
+ * traced on the dev shim. The same child read by a draining parent boots and
+ * serves, exit 0 at a 20 s SIGTERM, having written 7926 bytes over 16.6 s. So
+ * the crash costs the run at its FIRST diagnostic line and 20 of its 21 stderr
+ * writes, on the entry point a customer's install actually runs (`files` names
+ * only `dist`, but npm packs a `bin` target regardless — #14874).
+ *
+ * ⛔ Deliberately NOT narrowed to `error.code === 'EPIPE'`, for the reason
+ * `bin/run-dev.js` records: the reason to tolerate is not WHICH error it is.
+ * Every event here means one thing — a write to stderr failed — the only
+ * channel it could be reported on is the stream that just failed, and there is
+ * no other action to take.
+ *
+ * ⚠️ What it costs: a long-running command whose reader has gone now keeps
+ * running instead of dying on its first diagnostic. That is the point (the
+ * server is still serving, and its caller still gets the CLI's own status), but
+ * it is a real behaviour change for a supervisor that destroyed the read end
+ * and relied on the crash to end the child.
+ */
+process.stderr.on('error', () => {
+  // Nothing to report, and nowhere left to report it.
+});
+
 await run(process.argv.slice(2), import.meta.url)
   .then(async (result) => {
     flush();

packages/cli/test/fixtures/published-entry-stderr-error-probe.mjs

@@ -0,0 +1,121 @@
+// Copyright (c) 2026 ObjectStack. Licensed under the Apache-2.0 license.
+
+/**
+ * The #14858 crash class, manufactured INSIDE the published entry point's own
+ * process — driven by `published-entry-stderr-error-listener.e2e.test.ts`.
+ *
+ * Loaded with `node --import <this> bin/run.js …` against a read end the parent
+ * has destroyed, so everything below runs in the same process as the shipped
+ * CLI, on the same open file description, after `bin/run.js` has had its chance
+ * to attach the `error` listener.
+ *
+ * ## Why the failing write is manufactured rather than taken from a command
+ *
+ * The field reproduction is `os serve`: `printDiagnostic` writes straight to
+ * stderr (#7915), the boot around it is asynchronous, and #15564 measured the
+ * published entry dying there — `write EPIPE` at `afterWriteDispatched`, exit
+ * 1, 3 of 3 runs, 3049-3433 ms in. Reproducing THAT needs a fixture app, a
+ * database, a bound port and four seconds per leg, and it pins the crash to one
+ * command that could stop writing raw tomorrow. What the entry point owes is
+ * narrower and does not move: **a failed stderr write in this process must not
+ * be fatal.** One raw write to a destroyed pipe is the whole of that hazard,
+ * and it costs milliseconds.
+ *
+ * ⛔ The write is deliberately `process.stderr.write` and NOT `console.error`.
+ * Node's `console.error` carries `ignoreErrors`, which parks a temporary
+ * `error` listener across the write, so it cannot crash a process at any
+ * payload size — measured at 1 MiB, 0 of 3, against one line through
+ * `process.stderr.write` at 3 of 3. A probe written with `console.error` would
+ * be green with the listener REMOVED, which is the one thing it must not be.
+ *
+ * ## The two arms, and why the unguarded one is not an ablation
+ *
+ * `OS_PUBLISHED_ENTRY_ERROR_PROBE_ARM=unguarded` makes this probe remove the
+ * entry's listener in its own process before writing. That is the harness's
+ * LIVE POSITIVE CONTROL: it shows, in the same run and against the same tree,
+ * that this instrument can still see the crash — so the guarded arm's silence
+ * is a reading rather than a zero. Nothing on disk is touched, so it costs no
+ * restore and cannot leave a mutated tree behind.
+ *
+ * Markers go to a file: stderr is the thing under test and, on the arm that is
+ * supposed to fail, the thing that is already broken.
+ *
+ * env: `OS_PUBLISHED_ENTRY_ERROR_PROBE_MARKS` — the marker file.
+ * env: `OS_PUBLISHED_ENTRY_ERROR_PROBE_ARM`   — `guarded` (default) | `unguarded`.
+ */
+
+import { appendFileSync } from 'node:fs';
+
+const MARKS = process.env.OS_PUBLISHED_ENTRY_ERROR_PROBE_MARKS;
+const UNGUARDED = process.env.OS_PUBLISHED_ENTRY_ERROR_PROBE_ARM === 'unguarded';
+
+const mark = (line) => appendFileSync(MARKS, `${line}\n`);
+
+/**
+ * How long to wait for `bin/run.js` to attach its listener before proceeding
+ * anyway.
+ *
+ * A CONSTANT, and far above anything the attach legitimately needs: it happens
+ * at the top of `bin/run.js`, after one dynamic `import()` of a dependency-free
+ * module, and every `@oclif/core` byte is written later, inside `run()`. The
+ * bound exists only so an absent listener is REPORTED rather than waited on
+ * forever — it is not an oracle over how fast the attach is, and the harness
+ * asserts the mark this produces rather than the number in it.
+ */
+const ATTACH_WAIT_MS = 15_000;
+
+/** Comfortably finer than anything being timed. */
+const POLL_MS = 10;
+
+/**
+ * ⛔ This probe installs NO `error` listener of its own on `process.stderr`.
+ * `uncaughtExceptionMonitor` observes the default action without preventing it,
+ * so an unguarded run still dies exactly as it would unobserved — an
+ * `uncaughtException` handler would have changed the very thing being read.
+ */
+process.on('uncaughtExceptionMonitor', (error) => {
+  mark(`UNCAUGHT code=${error?.code} msg=${error?.message}`);
+});
+
+process.on('exit', (code) => mark(`EXIT code=${code}`));
+
+function writeAndOutliveIt() {
+  // ONE raw write. The read end is already gone, so this fails; whether that
+  // failure is fatal is the entire subject.
+  process.stderr.write('published-entry-stderr-error-probe: one line to a read end that is gone\n');
+  mark('WROTE');
+
+  // ⚠️ The turn is the point, not the delay. A failing write reports through
+  // libuv's completion callback, so a write followed by a SYNCHRONOUS exit is
+  // never told at all — which is exactly why the two probes on #15564's card
+  // read clean, and why a probe that exited here would reproduce their zero
+  // reading instead of testing anything.
+  //
+  // ⛔ NOT unref'd: this timer is what keeps the process alive across that
+  // turn, and an unref'd one would let the CLI's own exit race it away.
+  setTimeout(() => {
+    mark('SURVIVED');
+    // A distinctive status, so "ended on its own past the write" is evidence
+    // about THIS probe rather than about any process that happens to exit 0.
+    process.exit(7);
+  }, 250);
+}
+
+let waited = 0;
+const poll = setInterval(() => {
+  const attached = process.stderr.listenerCount('error') > 0;
+  if (!attached && waited < ATTACH_WAIT_MS) {
+    waited += POLL_MS;
+    return;
+  }
+  clearInterval(poll);
+  mark(attached ? `LISTENER ATTACHED after ${waited} ms` : `LISTENER ABSENT after ${waited} ms`);
+  if (UNGUARDED) {
+    // The live positive control — in this process only, never on disk.
+    process.stderr.removeAllListeners('error');
+    mark(`ARM unguarded listeners=${process.stderr.listenerCount('error')}`);
+  } else {
+    mark(`ARM guarded listeners=${process.stderr.listenerCount('error')}`);
+  }
+  writeAndOutliveIt();
+}, POLL_MS);