-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 140
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Separate Pipeline type inference/checking & MRC pipeline construction #1233
Merged
rapids-bot
merged 187 commits into
nv-morpheus:branch-23.11
from
dagardner-nv:david-pipe-build-refactor-stage-schema
Oct 19, 2023
Merged
Separate Pipeline type inference/checking & MRC pipeline construction #1233
rapids-bot
merged 187 commits into
nv-morpheus:branch-23.11
from
dagardner-nv:david-pipe-build-refactor-stage-schema
Oct 19, 2023
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…xplicitly release reference to the executor after join and stop
…potentially raising an exception, this prevents an attribute error in the destructor
This reverts commit e949da1.
…RC's PyObjectWrapper
This reverts commit 0f7500c.
…d from MRC's PyObjectWrapper" This reverts commit 7394f23.
…avid-destructors-1114
…avid-destructors-1114
…avid-pipe-build-refactor
dagardner-nv
changed the title
Draft: Separate Pipeline type inference/checking & MRC pipeline construction pt2
Separate Pipeline type inference/checking & MRC pipeline construction
Oct 9, 2023
dagardner-nv
added
breaking
Breaking change
feature request
New feature or request
improvement
Improvement to existing functionality
and removed
improvement
Improvement to existing functionality
feature request
New feature or request
labels
Oct 9, 2023
2 tasks
mdemoret-nv
reviewed
Oct 19, 2023
mdemoret-nv
approved these changes
Oct 19, 2023
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Approving based on our many discussions of this PR. Documentation and full testing to come later
/merge |
rapids-bot bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 30, 2023
…own process (#1392) Due to the changes in #1233, the pipeline shutdown process has been slightly altered. This updates the viz demo to shutdown correctly without error. Also added support for exiting on Ctrl+C Fixes #1391 Authors: - Michael Demoret (https://github.com/mdemoret-nv) Approvers: - Eli Fajardo (https://github.com/efajardo-nv) - David Gardner (https://github.com/dagardner-nv) URL: #1392
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Pipeline.pre_build
and doesn't require MRCStageSchema
class which can later be expanded to describe tensors and dataframe columns.StreamWrapper
renamed toBaseStage
.BaseStage
defines a new abstract methodcompute_schema
generate_viz_frames_stage.py
where theoverwrite
argument was ignored leading to a failed assert.add_edge
,add_segment_edge
, oradd_stage
after callingbuild
will trigger a failed assert.fixes #229
fixes #230
By Submitting this PR I confirm: