Skip to content

Conversation

@iiio2
Copy link
Contributor

@iiio2 iiio2 commented Dec 13, 2024

Since node 22 is stable, I have updated node version to 22.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Updated Node.js version from 20 to 22 across multiple workflows, enhancing compatibility and performance.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved security by removing default permissions for the GITHUB_TOKEN in certain workflows.
  • Chores

    • Adjusted indentation and formatting in workflow configurations for better clarity.

@iiio2 iiio2 requested a review from danielroe as a code owner December 13, 2024 12:55
@bolt-new-by-stackblitz
Copy link

Review PR in StackBlitz Codeflow Run & review this pull request in StackBlitz Codeflow.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 13, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces updates to multiple GitHub Actions workflow files, primarily changing the Node.js version from 20 to 22 in the actions/setup-node step across various workflows. Additionally, some workflows have had their permissions adjusted to enhance security by removing default permissions for the GITHUB_TOKEN. The overall structure and logic of the workflows remain unchanged, with no alterations to exported or public entities.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
.github/workflows/autofix-docs.yml Updated node-version from 20 to 22; adjusted indentation for clarity.
.github/workflows/autofix.yml Updated node-version from 20 to 22; minor formatting adjustments.
.github/workflows/benchmark.yml Updated node-version from 20 to 22; no structural changes.
.github/workflows/changelog.yml Updated node-version from 20 to 22; no structural changes.
.github/workflows/ci.yml Updated node-version from 20 to 22 in multiple jobs; modified permissions and concurrency settings.
.github/workflows/docs.yml Updated node-version from 20 to 22; set permissions to an empty object.
.github/workflows/lint-monorepo.yml Updated node-version from 20 to 22; no other changes.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant GitHub Actions
    participant Node.js

    User->>GitHub Actions: Trigger Workflow
    GitHub Actions->>Node.js: Setup Node.js v22
    Node.js-->>GitHub Actions: Node.js v22 Ready
    GitHub Actions->>GitHub Actions: Execute Workflow Steps
    GitHub Actions-->>User: Workflow Complete
Loading

🐰 "In fields of code, we hop and play,
With Node.js upgraded today!
From twenty to twenty-two, we cheer,
A leap in tech, let's give a cheer!
With workflows bright, we dance and sing,
Hopping through changes, oh what joy they bring!" 🐇


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 51646a9 and 8077cf9.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/ci.yml (5 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • .github/workflows/ci.yml

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Experiment)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
.github/workflows/changelog.yml (1)

Line range hint 24-24: Consider centralizing Node.js version management.

To maintain consistency and simplify future updates, consider:

  1. Using a shared environment variable or GitHub Actions variable for the Node.js version
  2. Creating a reusable workflow for Node.js setup steps

Example implementation:

# .github/workflows/setup-node.yml
name: Reusable Node.js Setup
on:
  workflow_call:
    inputs:
      node-version:
        default: '22'
        type: string
jobs:
  setup:
    steps:
      - uses: actions/setup-node@v4
        with:
          node-version: ${{ inputs.node-version }}

Also applies to: 32-32, 31-31

.github/workflows/release.yml (1)

Line range hint 27-29: Critical: Node.js version not updated to v22

The Node.js version is still set to v20, which is inconsistent with the PR objective to upgrade to v22. This could lead to inconsistencies across workflows.

Apply this diff to maintain consistency:

  with:
-   node-version: 20
+   node-version: 22
    registry-url: "https://registry.npmjs.org/"
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4d22f4d and afc498b.

📒 Files selected for processing (8)
  • .github/workflows/autofix-docs.yml (2 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/autofix.yml (2 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/benchmark.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/changelog.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/ci.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/docs.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/lint-monorepo.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/release.yml (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
.github/workflows/autofix-docs.yml (1)

24-24: LGTM! Node.js version update is appropriate.

The upgrade to Node.js 22 is suitable as it's the latest stable version, and all workflow tasks are compatible with this version.

.github/workflows/changelog.yml (1)

31-31: LGTM! Node.js version update is consistent.

The upgrade to Node.js 22 aligns with the project-wide update, and the changelog generation tasks are compatible with this version.

.github/workflows/docs.yml (1)

28-28: LGTM: Node.js version update

The update to Node.js v22 aligns with the PR objectives and uses the latest stable version.

.github/workflows/autofix.yml (1)

20-20: LGTM: Node.js version update

The update to Node.js v22 aligns with the PR objectives and maintains workflow consistency.

.github/workflows/benchmark.yml (1)

36-36: LGTM! Verify CodSpeedHQ compatibility with Node.js 22

The update to Node.js 22 looks good. Since this workflow uses CodSpeedHQ for benchmarking, let's verify its compatibility.

- uses: actions/setup-node@39370e3970a6d050c480ffad4ff0ed4d3fdee5af # v4.1.0
with:
node-version: 20
node-version: 22
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Update Node.js version requirements in schema package

The monorepo has inconsistent Node.js version requirements. While most packages support Node.js 22 (>=22.0.0), the following packages have outdated requirements:

  • packages/schema/package.json: "^14.18.0 || >=16.10.0"
  • package.json (root): "^16.10.0 || >=18.0.0"

Please update these packages to align with the Node.js 22 requirement in the CI workflow.

🔗 Analysis chain

Verify monorepo package compatibility with Node.js 22.

While the Node.js version update is appropriate, please ensure all packages in the monorepo support Node.js 22 in their engines field.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check Node.js version requirements in all package.json files

# Find all package.json files and check their engines field
fd package.json --type f --exclude node_modules --exec sh -c 'echo "=== $1 ==="; cat "$1" | jq -r ".engines.node // \"No engine specified\""' sh {}

Length of output: 1430

id-token: write
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
timeout-minutes: 20
timeout-minutes: 22
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Timeout increase appears unnecessary without clear justification

The timeout was indeed increased from 20 to 22 minutes, but there's no evidence of workflow failures or timeouts that would justify this change. Additionally, since the Node.js version remains at v20 in the workflow, this timeout increase doesn't appear to be correlated with any Node.js version changes.

  • Consider reverting the timeout back to 20 minutes unless there's a specific reason for the increase that hasn't been documented
  • If there are specific timeout issues being addressed, please document them in the commit message or PR description
🔗 Analysis chain

Consider if timeout increase is necessary

The timeout has been increased from 20 to 22 minutes. Please clarify if this increase is related to the Node.js version update or if it's addressing a specific issue.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check recent workflow runs to see if they're timing out
gh run list --workflow=release.yml --limit 10 --json conclusion,durationMs | \
  jq '.[] | select(.conclusion=="failure") | .durationMs'

Length of output: 370


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check recent workflow runs with available fields
gh run list --workflow=release.yml --limit 10 --json conclusion,startedAt,updatedAt | \
  jq '.[] | select(.conclusion=="failure") | {conclusion: .conclusion, duration: (((.updatedAt | fromdateiso8601) - (.startedAt | fromdateiso8601))/60)}'

# Get the previous timeout value from git history
git log -p .github/workflows/release.yml | grep -A 1 "timeout-minutes:" | head -n 2

Length of output: 239


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the workflow file content and its recent changes
git show HEAD:.github/workflows/release.yml
git show HEAD^:.github/workflows/release.yml | grep "timeout-minutes:"

Length of output: 1298

- uses: actions/setup-node@39370e3970a6d050c480ffad4ff0ed4d3fdee5af # v4.1.0
with:
node-version: 20
node-version: 22
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

⚠️ Potential issue

Critical: Node.js version inconsistency confirmed in CI workflow

The verification confirms that the CI workflow (ci.yml) has inconsistent Node.js versions:

  • One job using Node.js 22
  • Five jobs using Node.js 20

This inconsistency needs to be addressed, especially since most other workflow files (docs.yml, lint-monorepo.yml, changelog.yml, autofix.yml, autofix-docs.yml, benchmark.yml) have already been updated to use Node.js 22.

Update all jobs in ci.yml to use Node.js 22 for consistency:

# Update in all job sections:
- node-version: 20
+ node-version: 22
🔗 Analysis chain

Critical: Inconsistent Node.js versions across jobs

The build job has been updated to Node.js 22, but other jobs (typecheck, lint, test-unit, build-release, release-pr) are still using Node.js 20. This inconsistency could lead to compatibility issues, especially since build artifacts from the build job (Node.js 22) are used in downstream jobs running Node.js 20.

Consider updating all jobs to use Node.js 22 for consistency:

# Update in all job sections:
- node-version: 20
+ node-version: 22

Affected jobs that need the update:

  • typecheck job (line ~120)
  • lint job (line ~160)
  • test-unit job (line ~190)
  • build-release job (line ~310)
  • release-pr job (line ~350)
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify Node.js version consistency across all workflow files

# Check Node.js versions in all workflow files
echo "Node.js versions in workflow files:"
rg "node-version: \d+" .github/workflows/

Length of output: 847

@iiio2 iiio2 requested a review from danielroe December 13, 2024 12:59
@danielroe
Copy link
Member

in general we want to run at least some tests on the lowest node version nuxt supports, to avoid unintended regressions (for example, if using new features of node)

@iiio2
Copy link
Contributor Author

iiio2 commented Dec 13, 2024

in general we want to run at least some tests on the lowest node version nuxt supports, to avoid unintended regressions (for example, if using new features of node)

Then will I target for node 18, 20 and 22 ?

@danielroe
Copy link
Member

let's aim to run fixtures on node 18, and everything else on node 22. sound good?

Copy link
Member

@danielroe danielroe left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

❤️

@danielroe danielroe merged commit f94a071 into nuxt:main Dec 13, 2024
40 of 43 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this pull request Dec 13, 2024
@iiio2
Copy link
Contributor Author

iiio2 commented Dec 13, 2024

Thanks @danielroe .

@iiio2 iiio2 deleted the ci/update-node-version branch December 13, 2024 15:12
Kamsou pushed a commit to Kamsou/nuxt that referenced this pull request Feb 5, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants