Skip to content

Conversation

@lukekarrys
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes #3314

@lukekarrys lukekarrys requested a review from a team as a code owner March 30, 2022 22:29
@npm-robot
Copy link
Contributor

found 1 benchmarks with statistically significant performance regressions

  • app-large: clean
timing results
app-large clean lock-only cache-only cache-only
peer-deps
modules-only no-lock no-cache no-modules no-clean no-clean
audit
npm@8 63.823 ±0.88 36.401 ±0.31 22.312 ±0.23 24.979 ±1.05 3.552 ±0.05 3.669 ±0.02 2.909 ±0.02 15.316 ±0.41 2.916 ±0.03 3.984 ±0.02
#4644 74.640 ±1.33 37.189 ±0.38 22.793 ±0.12 25.846 ±0.74 3.746 ±0.02 3.888 ±0.00 3.007 ±0.02 15.565 ±0.22 3.072 ±0.04 4.221 ±0.06
app-medium clean lock-only cache-only cache-only
peer-deps
modules-only no-lock no-cache no-modules no-clean no-clean
audit
npm@8 51.634 ±9.41 27.390 ±0.10 16.160 ±0.07 17.534 ±0.46 3.360 ±0.05 3.313 ±0.01 2.922 ±0.07 11.221 ±0.24 2.927 ±0.02 3.787 ±0.07
#4644 84.657 ±31.01 42.929 ±20.57 17.128 ±0.06 17.716 ±0.22 3.463 ±0.01 3.382 ±0.01 3.042 ±0.02 11.381 ±0.02 2.841 ±0.07 3.957 ±0.13

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

TERM=dumb and --no-progress is ignored

3 participants