Skip to content

Conversation

@ronag
Copy link
Member

@ronag ronag commented Apr 7, 2024

Fixes: #3065

This relates to...

Rationale

Changes

Features

Bug Fixes

Breaking Changes and Deprecations

Status

@ronag
Copy link
Member Author

ronag commented Apr 7, 2024

@metcoder95 any chance you can help me with a test?

@ronag ronag force-pushed the bad-client-destroy branch from e1950a0 to 40e866f Compare April 7, 2024 11:16
@ronag ronag force-pushed the bad-client-destroy branch from 40e866f to ae19601 Compare April 7, 2024 11:16
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Apr 7, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 93.79%. Comparing base (cae5625) to head (0127cf1).
Report is 649 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3066      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   93.51%   93.79%   +0.28%     
==========================================
  Files          89       89              
  Lines       24331    24337       +6     
==========================================
+ Hits        22754    22828      +74     
+ Misses       1577     1509      -68     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Copy link
Member

@metcoder95 metcoder95 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done @ronag can you take a look?

@metcoder95
Copy link
Member

I'll work for adding a test for h2 in another PR 👍

@ronag ronag requested review from Uzlopak and mcollina April 7, 2024 12:03
Copy link
Contributor

@Uzlopak Uzlopak left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@ronag ronag merged commit 7ae20e6 into main Apr 7, 2024
@Uzlopak Uzlopak deleted the bad-client-destroy branch April 7, 2024 12:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Unexpected error thrown during destorying the socket due to the "servername changed"

5 participants