bug: warning message still shows up even with `disableExperimentalSEAWarning` set to `true`

[YassinEldeeb]

Hey,

So, I have this issue, where i see this warning message, which doesn't affect my application logic:

(node:8292) Warning: Currently the require() provided to the main script embedded into single-executable applications only supports loading built-in modules.
To load a module from disk after the single executable application is launched, use require("module").createRequire().
Support for bundled module loading or virtual file systems are under discussions in https://github.com/nodejs/single-executable

Looking at the test bellow, shows that the expected behavior is for this message to only be shown if the disableExperimentalSEAWarning flag is not set to true
https://github.com/nodejs/node/blob/66c807693e6a92ff6429d3890d3fb96ece99b623/test/fixtures/sea.js#L15

But, when looking at the source code, this doesn't seem to be the case, there's no checks for this flag to ignore showing the message if it's set or not.
https://github.com/nodejs/node/blob/66c807693e6a92ff6429d3890d3fb96ece99b623/lib/internal/main/embedding.js#L101

Please let me know if I'm missing something, and how to avoid logging this warning message? Thanks

[joyeecheung]

This is a separate warning for require()-ing unsupported builtin modules (which means it may or may not work - we have never fully vetted that the builtin that you use works in SEA, your code might happen to work, or it may not, or it may seem to work but it crashes on some input - nobody has checked that module for the SEA use case, so nobody knows for sure).

[FiskPay]

Any update on the matter?

[koooge]

Hi there, I got this. I understand it's experimental so that's why I set disableExperimentalSEAWarning to true. IMO, the warning should be suppressed. Or please add another option to disable the message.

[mn4367]

I would also strongly advocate making the output of this warning configurable or removing it. I build command line tools with SEA and from the perspective of the user of one of these tools it would be very strange (but rather unacceptable) to see this output every time it is called.

[joyeecheung]

PRs are welcomed to fix it. It should be reasonably straightforward.