Skip to content

src: replace V8 Fast API todo comment with note comment #58614

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

dario-piotrowicz
Copy link
Member

@dario-piotrowicz dario-piotrowicz commented Jun 7, 2025

As you can see in #58544 adding a FAST V8 API version for the Blob::RevokeObjectURL function does not produce a performance benefit, so I am replacing the code
todo comment with a note mentioning that using the FAST API for such function is not benficial

@dario-piotrowicz dario-piotrowicz requested a review from anonrig June 7, 2025 14:20
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added c++ Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++. needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. labels Jun 7, 2025
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 7, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 90.21%. Comparing base (c2d4c78) to head (2023821).
Report is 13 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #58614      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   90.19%   90.21%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         636      636              
  Lines      187705   187718      +13     
  Branches    36852    36864      +12     
==========================================
+ Hits       169306   169350      +44     
+ Misses      11161    11120      -41     
- Partials     7238     7248      +10     
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
src/node_blob.cc 75.68% <ø> (ø)

... and 29 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@jasnell jasnell added author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. labels Jun 7, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Jun 7, 2025
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@dario-piotrowicz dario-piotrowicz added the commit-queue Add this label to land a pull request using GitHub Actions. label Jun 7, 2025
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot removed the commit-queue Add this label to land a pull request using GitHub Actions. label Jun 9, 2025
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot merged commit 3596ee0 into nodejs:main Jun 9, 2025
73 checks passed
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Landed in 3596ee0

@dario-piotrowicz dario-piotrowicz deleted the dario/remove-v8-fast-api-revoke-obj-url-todo-comment branch June 9, 2025 14:39
seriousme pushed a commit to seriousme/node that referenced this pull request Jun 10, 2025
PR-URL: nodejs#58614
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 16, 2025
PR-URL: #58614
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. c++ Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++. needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants