Skip to content

win,test: disable test case failing with ClangCL #57397

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 12, 2025

Conversation

StefanStojanovic
Copy link
Contributor

This PR disables a SIGQUIT test case on Windows for test-child-process-kill.js. As it can be seen from the CI results, this is the only blocker for enabling tests for ClangCL binaries on all CI runs. IMHO, this is a worthy trade-off.

In addition, this is a temporary thing as I plan to investigate it further and re-enable it ASAP. This problem does not exist when compiling Node.js on the latest Windows 10. Our CI compilation machines use Windows 2022 (Windows 11 basically), so the issue is Windows version specific, and I didn't experience it a few months ago.

I am currently reinstalling my Windows 11 machine (talk about bad timing...), so I should be able to investigate it there later this week.

I'll also request fast tracking, as the change is trivial.

After investigating, I will decide on how to approach it, there is the Node.js part and the libuv part here. Ideally, the fix will be on the Node.js side if feasible. This can be easily done by treating SIGQUIT as SIGKILL, but I'd like to keep possibility of using it on Windows if possible, as that is a possibility now.

@StefanStojanovic StefanStojanovic added windows Issues and PRs related to the Windows platform. test Issues and PRs related to the tests. fast-track PRs that do not need to wait for 48 hours to land. labels Mar 10, 2025
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added the needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. label Mar 10, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

Fast-track has been requested by @StefanStojanovic. Please 👍 to approve.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 10, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 90.21%. Comparing base (fbe37d5) to head (941a3e8).
Report is 16 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #57397      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   90.21%   90.21%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         630      630              
  Lines      185213   185213              
  Branches    36240    36243       +3     
==========================================
- Hits       167096   167094       -2     
+ Misses      11057    11054       -3     
- Partials     7060     7065       +5     

see 30 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@StefanStojanovic StefanStojanovic added the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Mar 10, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Mar 10, 2025
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@legendecas legendecas added the commit-queue Add this label to land a pull request using GitHub Actions. label Mar 12, 2025
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot removed the commit-queue Add this label to land a pull request using GitHub Actions. label Mar 12, 2025
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot merged commit 59f00d7 into nodejs:main Mar 12, 2025
58 checks passed
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Landed in 59f00d7

aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 18, 2025
PR-URL: #57397
Reviewed-By: Chengzhong Wu <legendecas@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
RafaelGSS pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 1, 2025
PR-URL: #57397
Reviewed-By: Chengzhong Wu <legendecas@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
RafaelGSS pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 1, 2025
PR-URL: #57397
Reviewed-By: Chengzhong Wu <legendecas@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
RafaelGSS pushed a commit to RafaelGSS/node that referenced this pull request Apr 8, 2025
PR-URL: nodejs#57397
Reviewed-By: Chengzhong Wu <legendecas@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
RafaelGSS pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 14, 2025
PR-URL: #57397
Reviewed-By: Chengzhong Wu <legendecas@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
RafaelGSS pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 14, 2025
PR-URL: #57397
Reviewed-By: Chengzhong Wu <legendecas@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 14, 2025
PR-URL: #57397
Reviewed-By: Chengzhong Wu <legendecas@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 14, 2025
PR-URL: #57397
Reviewed-By: Chengzhong Wu <legendecas@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 15, 2025
PR-URL: #57397
Reviewed-By: Chengzhong Wu <legendecas@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
RafaelGSS pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 16, 2025
PR-URL: #57397
Reviewed-By: Chengzhong Wu <legendecas@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
fast-track PRs that do not need to wait for 48 hours to land. needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. test Issues and PRs related to the tests. windows Issues and PRs related to the Windows platform.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants