-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 34.1k
net: add net.BlockList.isBlockList(value) #56078
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
Review requested:
|
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
b65f654 to
01f2756
Compare
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
mcollina
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm
| /** | ||
| * Returns true if the value is a BlockList | ||
| * @param {any} value | ||
| * @returns {boolean} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we could use asserts here
| * @returns {boolean} | |
| * @returns {asserts value is BlockList} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not quite sure what this would accomplish. The method does not assert at all, it just returns true or false and should not throw any errors.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
01f2756 to
d59f41f
Compare
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
|
Landed in c7de0ec |
No description provided.