fs: recursive cp methods as stable #53127
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
nodejs-github-bot
added
doc
theoludwig
commented
May 23, 2024
Member
|
@nodejs/fs |
aduh95
approved these changes
May 24, 2024
lpinca
approved these changes
May 25, 2024
jasnell
approved these changes
May 25, 2024
VoltrexKeyva
approved these changes
May 26, 2024
aduh95
added
notable-change
Contributor
|
The
notable-change
Please suggest a text for the release notes if you'd like to include a more detailed summary, then proceed to update the PR description with the text or a link to the notable change suggested text comment. Otherwise, the commit will be placed in the Other Notable Changes section. |
Contributor
|
Landed in ff659fa |
Merged
marco-ippolito
added
the
baking-for-lts
aduh95
removed
the
baking-for-lts
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
8 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #44598 (was annoyed by the stale bot 😆)
It seems like, it is only marking them as stable in the documentation. Is it intended that these functions doesn't contain
emitExperimentalWarningcalls?Fixes: #44598