test: drop test-crypto-timing-safe-equal-benchmarks#52751
Merged
nodejs-github-bot merged 2 commits intonodejs:mainfrom May 1, 2024
Merged
test: drop test-crypto-timing-safe-equal-benchmarks#52751nodejs-github-bot merged 2 commits intonodejs:mainfrom
nodejs-github-bot merged 2 commits intonodejs:mainfrom
Conversation
nodejs-github-bot
added
needs-ci
marco-ippolito
approved these changes
Apr 29, 2024
Member
|
Can you remove the flaky entries from the status file as well? |
Member
Author
Done |
panva
approved these changes
Apr 29, 2024
targos
approved these changes
Apr 29, 2024
github-actions
bot
removed
the
request-ci
Collaborator
lemire
approved these changes
Apr 29, 2024
Member
lemire
left a comment
lemire
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Timings tests make some assumptions regarding the host. On a noisy host, I would expect false positives.
richardlau
approved these changes
Apr 29, 2024
Collaborator
Collaborator
panva
added
author ready
lpinca
approved these changes
Apr 30, 2024
Member
|
cc @tniessen |
Trott
approved these changes
Apr 30, 2024
Member
Trott
left a comment
Trott
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Reluctantly, I have to concede that if we have a test that is apparently unreliable and fails frequently, and we have been ignoring these failures for years, removing the test seems like the right thing to do. It's not serving any purpose if someone isn't trying to fix the test (or fix the underlying issue, if any).
nodejs-github-bot
removed
the
commit-queue
Collaborator
|
Landed in b876e00 |
Ch3nYuY
pushed a commit
to Ch3nYuY/node
that referenced
this pull request
May 8, 2024
PR-URL: nodejs#52751 Refs: nodejs#38226 Reviewed-By: Marco Ippolito <marcoippolito54@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Filip Skokan <panva.ip@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com> Reviewed-By: Daniel Lemire <daniel@lemire.me> Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <rlau@redhat.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
targos
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 8, 2024
PR-URL: #52751 Refs: #38226 Reviewed-By: Marco Ippolito <marcoippolito54@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Filip Skokan <panva.ip@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com> Reviewed-By: Daniel Lemire <daniel@lemire.me> Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <rlau@redhat.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
marco-ippolito
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 17, 2024
PR-URL: #52751 Refs: #38226 Reviewed-By: Marco Ippolito <marcoippolito54@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Filip Skokan <panva.ip@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com> Reviewed-By: Daniel Lemire <daniel@lemire.me> Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <rlau@redhat.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Merged
eliphazbouye
pushed a commit
to eliphazbouye/node
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 20, 2024
PR-URL: nodejs#52751 Refs: nodejs#38226 Reviewed-By: Marco Ippolito <marcoippolito54@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Filip Skokan <panva.ip@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com> Reviewed-By: Daniel Lemire <daniel@lemire.me> Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <rlau@redhat.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
bmeck
pushed a commit
to bmeck/node
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 22, 2024
PR-URL: nodejs#52751 Refs: nodejs#38226 Reviewed-By: Marco Ippolito <marcoippolito54@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Filip Skokan <panva.ip@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com> Reviewed-By: Daniel Lemire <daniel@lemire.me> Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <rlau@redhat.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
9 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This has been constantly failing on macOS recently and given to the fact an issue has been opened since 2021 and no one worked on that, we should just drop it. Please note, that timing benchmarks tend to be flaky at some point, so we might want to test it differently.
Refs: #38226
cc: @Trott @mhdawson @richardlau