-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
misc cleanup #5233
Closed
Closed
misc cleanup #5233
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The value's type is unsigned so it will always be >= 0.
The value passed to `process.nextTick()` which is passed to the callback is already a valid object, so the conditional will always evaluate to true.
The comment refers to a property (called `_pendings`) that no longer exists.
mscdex
added
http
Issues or PRs related to the http subsystem.
lib / src
Issues and PRs related to general changes in the lib or src directory.
labels
Feb 15, 2016
CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/1660/ All green except for a few flaky test failures. |
LGTM |
1 similar comment
LGTM |
jasnell
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 15, 2016
The value's type is unsigned so it will always be >= 0. PR-URL: #5233 Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
jasnell
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 15, 2016
The value passed to `process.nextTick()` which is passed to the callback is already a valid object, so the conditional will always evaluate to true. PR-URL: #5233 Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
jasnell
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 15, 2016
The comment refers to a property (called `_pendings`) that no longer exists. PR-URL: #5233 Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
rvagg
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 15, 2016
The value's type is unsigned so it will always be >= 0. PR-URL: #5233 Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
rvagg
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 15, 2016
The value passed to `process.nextTick()` which is passed to the callback is already a valid object, so the conditional will always evaluate to true. PR-URL: #5233 Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
rvagg
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 15, 2016
The comment refers to a property (called `_pendings`) that no longer exists. PR-URL: #5233 Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
stefanmb
pushed a commit
to stefanmb/node
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 23, 2016
The value's type is unsigned so it will always be >= 0. PR-URL: nodejs#5233 Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
stefanmb
pushed a commit
to stefanmb/node
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 23, 2016
The value passed to `process.nextTick()` which is passed to the callback is already a valid object, so the conditional will always evaluate to true. PR-URL: nodejs#5233 Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
stefanmb
pushed a commit
to stefanmb/node
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 23, 2016
The comment refers to a property (called `_pendings`) that no longer exists. PR-URL: nodejs#5233 Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
This PR is not landing cleanly on LTS. Would someone be willing to backport? |
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 17, 2016
The value passed to `process.nextTick()` which is passed to the callback is already a valid object, so the conditional will always evaluate to true. PR-URL: #5233 Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 17, 2016
The comment refers to a property (called `_pendings`) that no longer exists. PR-URL: #5233 Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Adding a |
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 21, 2016
The value passed to `process.nextTick()` which is passed to the callback is already a valid object, so the conditional will always evaluate to true. PR-URL: #5233 Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 21, 2016
The comment refers to a property (called `_pendings`) that no longer exists. PR-URL: #5233 Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
3 tasks
Merged
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Just a few minor changes.