-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
test: split wasi tests #51836
test: split wasi tests #51836
Conversation
Review requested:
|
When #51834 lands we need to update the status file to only mark the affected test case as flaky (I suspect it's Before the split the wasi tests on my laptop finish in 10s, after it finish in 6s (and it's also the |
2754361
to
a51bdf3
Compare
The CI shows that test-wasi-poll is indeed what triggers the flake: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-binary-windows-js-suites/25993/ Rebased and updated the status file to only mark test-wasi-poll as flaky. |
Move the child process code into a fixture and split the test so that it can be run in parallel and it's easier to identify where the failure is coming from. Also use the spawnSyncAndExitWithoutError() utility so that the test shows complete information on failure. Instead of marking all the wasi tests as flaky, only mark the wasi-poll one which is flaking in the CI now.
a51bdf3
to
a8b6574
Compare
CI seemed happy with the wasi tests (Windows still failed due to an rm error) |
Stress tests on Windows for the unmarked tests: https://ci.nodejs.org/view/Stress/job/node-stress-single-test/474/ |
Landed in a5376c5 |
Move the child process code into a fixture and split the test so that it can be run in parallel and it's easier to identify where the failure is coming from. Also use the spawnSyncAndExitWithoutError() utility so that the test shows complete information on failure. Instead of marking all the wasi tests as flaky, only mark the wasi-poll one which is flaking in the CI now. PR-URL: #51836 Refs: #51822 Reviewed-By: Marco Ippolito <marcoippolito54@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Move the child process code into a fixture and split the test so that it can be run in parallel and it's easier to identify where the failure is coming from. Also use the spawnSyncAndExitWithoutError() utility so that the test shows complete information on failure. Instead of marking all the wasi tests as flaky, only mark the wasi-poll one which is flaking in the CI now. PR-URL: #51836 Refs: #51822 Reviewed-By: Marco Ippolito <marcoippolito54@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Move the child process code into a fixture and split the test so that it can be run in parallel and it's easier to identify where the failure is coming from. Also use the spawnSyncAndExitWithoutError() utility so that the test shows complete information on failure. Instead of marking all the wasi tests as flaky, only mark the wasi-poll one which is flaking in the CI now. PR-URL: #51836 Refs: #51822 Reviewed-By: Marco Ippolito <marcoippolito54@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Move the child process code into a fixture and split the test so that it can be run in parallel and it's easier to identify where the failure is coming from. Also use the spawnSyncAndExitWithoutError() utility so that the test shows complete information on failure. Instead of marking all the wasi tests as flaky, only mark the wasi-poll one which is flaking in the CI now. PR-URL: #51836 Refs: #51822 Reviewed-By: Marco Ippolito <marcoippolito54@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Move the child process code into a fixture and split the test so that it can be run in parallel and it's easier to identify where the failure is coming from. Also use the spawnSyncAndExitWithoutError() utility so that the test shows complete information on failure. Instead of marking all the wasi tests as flaky, only mark the wasi-poll one which is flaking in the CI now. PR-URL: #51836 Refs: #51822 Reviewed-By: Marco Ippolito <marcoippolito54@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Move the child process code into a fixture and split the test so that it can be run in parallel and it's easier to identify where the failure is coming from. Also use the spawnSyncAndExitWithoutError() utility so that the test shows complete information on failure. Instead of marking all the wasi tests as flaky, only mark the wasi-poll one which is flaking in the CI now. PR-URL: nodejs#51836 Refs: nodejs#51822 Reviewed-By: Marco Ippolito <marcoippolito54@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Move the child process code into a fixture and split the test
so that it can be run in parallel and it's easier to identify
where the failure is coming from. Also use the
spawnSyncAndExitWithoutError() utility so that the test shows
complete information on failure.
Instead of marking all the wasi tests as flaky, only mark the
wasi-poll one which is flaking in the CI now.
Refs: #51822