-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
src: do not rely on the internal field being default to undefined #49413
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
It's an undocumented V8 behavior that is subject to change. Instead just check if the internal field is set to a promise. There is also no need to check IsEmpty() since the object is guaranteed to be constructed by the FileHandle constructor with enough internal fields.
nodejs-github-bot
added
c++
Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++.
fs
Issues and PRs related to the fs subsystem / file system.
needs-ci
PRs that need a full CI run.
labels
Aug 30, 2023
anonrig
approved these changes
Aug 31, 2023
github-actions
bot
removed
the
request-ci
Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR.
label
Aug 31, 2023
20 tasks
22 tasks
This was referenced Sep 3, 2023
joyeecheung
added
the
commit-queue
Add this label to land a pull request using GitHub Actions.
label
Sep 6, 2023
nodejs-github-bot
added
commit-queue-failed
An error occurred while landing this pull request using GitHub Actions.
and removed
commit-queue
Add this label to land a pull request using GitHub Actions.
labels
Sep 6, 2023
Commit Queue failed- Loading data for nodejs/node/pull/49413 ✔ Done loading data for nodejs/node/pull/49413 ----------------------------------- PR info ------------------------------------ Title src: do not rely on the internal field being default to undefined (#49413) Author Joyee Cheung (@joyeecheung) Branch joyeecheung:fd-internal-field -> nodejs:main Labels c++, fs, needs-ci Commits 1 - src: do not rely on the internal field being default to undefined Committers 1 - Joyee Cheung PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/49413 Refs: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/4707972/comment/be9285cc_a49aad88/ Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli ------------------------------ Generated metadata ------------------------------ PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/49413 Refs: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/4707972/comment/be9285cc_a49aad88/ Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ℹ This PR was created on Wed, 30 Aug 2023 21:58:27 GMT ✔ Approvals: 1 ✔ - Yagiz Nizipli (@anonrig) (TSC): https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/49413#pullrequestreview-1603680709 ✘ This PR needs to wait 6 more hours to land (or 0 hours if there is one more approval) ✔ Last GitHub CI successful ℹ Last Full PR CI on 2023-09-02T20:15:12Z: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/53698/ - Querying data for job/node-test-pull-request/53698/ ✔ Last Jenkins CI successful -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ✔ Aborted `git node land` session in /home/runner/work/node/node/.ncuhttps://github.com/nodejs/node/actions/runs/6099430352 |
20 tasks
lpinca
added
commit-queue
Add this label to land a pull request using GitHub Actions.
and removed
commit-queue-failed
An error occurred while landing this pull request using GitHub Actions.
labels
Sep 7, 2023
nodejs-github-bot
removed
the
commit-queue
Add this label to land a pull request using GitHub Actions.
label
Sep 7, 2023
Landed in 941ad8b |
ruyadorno
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 28, 2023
It's an undocumented V8 behavior that is subject to change. Instead just check if the internal field is set to a promise. There is also no need to check IsEmpty() since the object is guaranteed to be constructed by the FileHandle constructor with enough internal fields. PR-URL: #49413 Refs: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/4707972/comment/be9285cc_a49aad88/ Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
alexfernandez
pushed a commit
to alexfernandez/node
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 1, 2023
It's an undocumented V8 behavior that is subject to change. Instead just check if the internal field is set to a promise. There is also no need to check IsEmpty() since the object is guaranteed to be constructed by the FileHandle constructor with enough internal fields. PR-URL: nodejs#49413 Refs: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/4707972/comment/be9285cc_a49aad88/ Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
It's an undocumented V8 behavior that is subject to change. Instead just check if the internal field is set to a promise. There is also no need to check IsEmpty() since the object is guaranteed to be constructed by the FileHandle constructor with enough internal fields.
Refs: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/4707972/comment/be9285cc_a49aad88/