Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

lib: use kEmptyObject as default value for options #46011

Merged

Conversation

deokjinkim
Copy link
Contributor

kEmptyObject is more suitable than {} if options don't need mutation.

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Review requested:

  • @nodejs/http2
  • @nodejs/net

@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added lib / src Issues and PRs related to general changes in the lib or src directory. needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. labels Dec 29, 2022
`kEmptyObject` is more suitable than {} if options don't
need mutation.
@deokjinkim deokjinkim force-pushed the 221229_use_kemptyobject_options branch from cab08ea to 0ee6cae Compare December 29, 2022 07:33
@aduh95 aduh95 added author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. labels Dec 29, 2022
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Dec 29, 2022
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@aduh95 aduh95 added the commit-queue Add this label to land a pull request using GitHub Actions. label Dec 29, 2022
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot removed the commit-queue Add this label to land a pull request using GitHub Actions. label Dec 31, 2022
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot merged commit d160518 into nodejs:main Dec 31, 2022
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Landed in d160518

RafaelGSS pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 2, 2023
`kEmptyObject` is more suitable than {} if options don't
need mutation.

PR-URL: #46011
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Rafael Gonzaga <rafael.nunu@hotmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
@RafaelGSS RafaelGSS mentioned this pull request Jan 2, 2023
RafaelGSS pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 4, 2023
`kEmptyObject` is more suitable than {} if options don't
need mutation.

PR-URL: #46011
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Rafael Gonzaga <rafael.nunu@hotmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
RafaelGSS pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 5, 2023
`kEmptyObject` is more suitable than {} if options don't
need mutation.

PR-URL: #46011
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Rafael Gonzaga <rafael.nunu@hotmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
juanarbol pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 26, 2023
`kEmptyObject` is more suitable than {} if options don't
need mutation.

PR-URL: #46011
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Rafael Gonzaga <rafael.nunu@hotmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
@juanarbol juanarbol mentioned this pull request Jan 28, 2023
juanarbol pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 31, 2023
`kEmptyObject` is more suitable than {} if options don't
need mutation.

PR-URL: #46011
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Rafael Gonzaga <rafael.nunu@hotmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. lib / src Issues and PRs related to general changes in the lib or src directory. needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants