Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test: improve expectWarning error message #41326

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 30, 2021

Conversation

Trott
Copy link
Member

@Trott Trott commented Dec 26, 2021

expectWarning() fails with a TypeError and a message about undefined not
being iterable when the warning is emitted more times than expected.
This change produces a more useful error message.

Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/41307/files#r775197738

expectWarning() fails with a TypeError and a message about undefined not
being iterable when the warning is emitted more times than expected.
This change produces a more useful error message.

Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/41307/files#r775197738
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. test Issues and PRs related to the tests. labels Dec 26, 2021
@Trott Trott added the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Dec 26, 2021
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Dec 26, 2021
@nodejs-github-bot

This comment has been minimized.

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@Trott Trott added the commit-queue Add this label to land a pull request using GitHub Actions. label Dec 30, 2021
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot removed the commit-queue Add this label to land a pull request using GitHub Actions. label Dec 30, 2021
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot merged commit 0465373 into nodejs:master Dec 30, 2021
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Landed in 0465373

targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 14, 2022
expectWarning() fails with a TypeError and a message about undefined not
being iterable when the warning is emitted more times than expected.
This change produces a more useful error message.

Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/41307/files#r775197738

PR-URL: #41326
Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <tniessen@tnie.de>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
danielleadams pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 31, 2022
expectWarning() fails with a TypeError and a message about undefined not
being iterable when the warning is emitted more times than expected.
This change produces a more useful error message.

Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/41307/files#r775197738

PR-URL: #41326
Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <tniessen@tnie.de>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Linkgoron pushed a commit to Linkgoron/node that referenced this pull request Jan 31, 2022
expectWarning() fails with a TypeError and a message about undefined not
being iterable when the warning is emitted more times than expected.
This change produces a more useful error message.

Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/41307/files#r775197738

PR-URL: nodejs#41326
Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <tniessen@tnie.de>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
danielleadams pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 1, 2022
expectWarning() fails with a TypeError and a message about undefined not
being iterable when the warning is emitted more times than expected.
This change produces a more useful error message.

Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/41307/files#r775197738

PR-URL: #41326
Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <tniessen@tnie.de>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
@danielleadams danielleadams mentioned this pull request Feb 1, 2022
@Trott Trott deleted the expect-warning-message branch September 25, 2022 17:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. test Issues and PRs related to the tests.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants