test,http: check that http server is robust from handler abuse#37958
Merged
Trott merged 1 commit intonodejs:masterfrom Apr 8, 2021
Merged
test,http: check that http server is robust from handler abuse#37958Trott merged 1 commit intonodejs:masterfrom
Trott merged 1 commit intonodejs:masterfrom
Conversation
nodejs-github-bot
added
needs-ci
cjihrig
approved these changes
Mar 30, 2021
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
jasnell
approved these changes
Apr 6, 2021
Collaborator
Collaborator
The only way I could find to complete coverage for _http_common.js is to
use semi-private (exposed but probably shouldn't be) handlers to get the
state into something weird. With the if-condition being checked (see
Refs) commented out, I get this result from this test:
```
node:_http_common:140
if (len > 0 && !stream._dumped) {
^
TypeError: Cannot read property '_dumped' of null
at HTTPParser.parserOnBody (node:_http_common:140:26)
```
With the check in place, the test passes without an error. Seems like
quite the edge case, but I'm going to assume it's there for a reason.
Refs: https://coverage.nodejs.org/coverage-b560645d6b0a4bed/lib/_http_common.js.html#L137
PR-URL: nodejs#37958
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Trott
force-pushed
the
robust-from-tampering
branch
from
5c84d96 to
0da7a11
Compare
Member
Author
|
Landed in 0da7a11 |
targos
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 1, 2021
The only way I could find to complete coverage for _http_common.js is to
use semi-private (exposed but probably shouldn't be) handlers to get the
state into something weird. With the if-condition being checked (see
Refs) commented out, I get this result from this test:
```
node:_http_common:140
if (len > 0 && !stream._dumped) {
^
TypeError: Cannot read property '_dumped' of null
at HTTPParser.parserOnBody (node:_http_common:140:26)
```
With the check in place, the test passes without an error. Seems like
quite the edge case, but I'm going to assume it's there for a reason.
Refs: https://coverage.nodejs.org/coverage-b560645d6b0a4bed/lib/_http_common.js.html#L137
PR-URL: #37958
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Merged
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The only way I could find to complete coverage for _http_common.js is to
use semi-private (exposed but probably shouldn't be) handlers to get the
state into something weird. With the if-condition being checked (see
Refs) commented out, I get this result from this test:
With the check in place, the test passes without an error. Seems like
quite the edge case, but I'm going to assume it's there for a reason.
Refs: https://coverage.nodejs.org/coverage-b560645d6b0a4bed/lib/_http_common.js.html#L137