docs: revised the link about the Collaborators discussion page

[iam-frankqiu]

Revised the link about the Collaborators discussion page.

Checklist

• make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
• documentation is changed or added
• commit message follows commit guidelines

[Trott]

Current link is correct. This change uses a link to the Node.js repo discussion page which is different.

[Trott]

I'm going to close this, but feel free to comment or re-open if you think that's hasty of me.

[iam-frankqiu]

Current link is correct. This change uses a link to the Node.js repo discussion page which is different.

The current link leads to a 404 page. That's why I revised it. You can try to open the link. I have tried before.

[iam-frankqiu]

I'm going to close this, but feel free to comment or re-open if you think that's hasty of me.

I'm going to close this, but feel free to comment or re-open if you think that's hasty of me.

It seems that I have no qualification to re-open this pull request.

[Trott]

The current link leads to a 404 page. That's why I revised it. You can try to open the link. I have tried before.

Is it a 404 or a 403? If 404, that's unfortunate and (IMO, at least) a GitHub bug. You need to have permissions to open it. It's restricted to members of @nodejs/collaborators, I believe. This is a public document, so that should be mentioned in the text to avoid this kind of confusion. So maybe that can be the change this PR implements?

[targos]

It's a 404 and I don't think GitHub would consider it a bug. Many URLs return 404 when you don't have the permissions to view them. I believe it is to hide the fact that the URL is valid.

[Trott]

It's a 404 and I don't think GitHub would consider it a bug. Many URLs return 404 when you don't have the permissions to view them. I believe it is to hide the fact that the URL is valid.

Yeah, I'm aware of that practice. It just seems like an odd thing to choose to hide in this case and in my opinion. Ergo: Bug in my opinion. But my opinion is not as informed as the folks at GitHub so there's a high likelihood I'm just straight up wrong. 😀