[v12.x] deps: V8: cherry-pick 548f6c81d424 #33553
Closed
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original commit message:
[runtime] Don't track transitions for certainly detached maps
Previously such maps were marked as prototype, but that has bad
performance / memory characteristics if objects are used as
dictionaries.
Bug: b:148346655, v8:10339
Change-Id: I287c5664c8b7799a084669aaaffe3affcf73e95f
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2179322
Reviewed-by: Igor Sheludko <ishell@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#67537}
Refs: v8/v8@548f6c8
PR-URL: nodejs#33484
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Matheus Marchini <mat@mmarchini.me>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
nodejs-github-bot
added
build
dominykas
commented
May 25, 2020
| # Reset this number to 0 on major V8 upgrades. | ||
| # Increment by one for each non-official patch applied to deps/v8. | ||
| 'v8_embedder_string': '-node.37', | ||
| 'v8_embedder_string': '-node.38', |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This line had a conflict when cherrypicking, but I think this just needs an increment, right?
addaleax
changed the title
dominykas
commented
May 25, 2020
| // in the descriptor array. | ||
| DCHECK(result.owns_descriptors()); | ||
| DCHECK_EQ(result.NumberOfOwnDescriptors(), | ||
| DCHECK_LE(result.NumberOfOwnDescriptors(), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This line had a conflict (the context above it has changed) - I only changed the affected line.
dominykas
commented
May 25, 2020
| if (!parent->GetBackPointer().IsUndefined(isolate)) { | ||
| parent->set_owns_descriptors(false); | ||
| } else { | ||
| } else if (!parent->IsDetached(isolate)) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This line had a conflict (the context below it has changed) - I only changed the affected line.
dominykas
commented
May 25, 2020
| RuntimeCallTimerScope stats_scope( | ||
| isolate, *map, | ||
| map->is_prototype_map() | ||
| map->IsDetached(isolate) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This line had a conflict (the context above it has changed) - I only changed the affected line.
addaleax
approved these changes
May 25, 2020
BridgeAR
added
the
author ready
targos
approved these changes
May 25, 2020
|
@targos @dominykas Could you help us understand, To which version of Nodejs the fix will go? |
|
@ashupro we will not know which exact version this will be released in until this actually lands in a release, as the version is determined by semver, but this PR is for the |
|
This will probably land in the next non-security v12.x release, on 2020-06-16 |
Merged
codebytere
approved these changes
Jun 9, 2020
|
Landed in af95bd7 |
codebytere
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 9, 2020
Original commit message:
[runtime] Don't track transitions for certainly detached maps
Previously such maps were marked as prototype, but that has bad
performance / memory characteristics if objects are used as
dictionaries.
Bug: b:148346655, v8:10339
Change-Id: I287c5664c8b7799a084669aaaffe3affcf73e95f
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2179322
Reviewed-by: Igor Sheludko <ishell@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#67537}
Refs: v8/v8@548f6c8
PR-URL: #33484
Backport-PR-URL: #33553
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Matheus Marchini <mat@mmarchini.me>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
This was referenced Jan 25, 2022
This was referenced Jan 26, 2022
This was referenced Sep 27, 2022
This was referenced Sep 28, 2022
This was referenced Dec 15, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
7 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
git cherry-pick 78eb420fed154b7729283a3d63c99fa9989ffbeaOriginal commit message:
Refs: v8/v8@548f6c8
PR-URL: #33484
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen anna@addaleax.net
Reviewed-By: Matheus Marchini mat@mmarchini.me
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina matteo.collina@gmail.com
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig cjihrig@gmail.com
Reviewed-By: James M Snell jasnell@gmail.com
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater ruben@bridgewater.de
Checklist
make -j4 test(UNIX), orvcbuild test(Windows) passes